[Gracey]

Maam. If they were trying to be FAIR, then why wasn't LAURA BUSH on top. Hillary was on top. and Bush (B) comes before Clinton (C). It was darned BIASED. They could have put Laura and Hillary on there. Or they could have added Rosalind Carter, Mrs. Lyndon Johnson, enough to make it balance. That's the only fair way.

It's a well known fact that when you wish to skew the results you add only ONE of the party you wish to win and MANY of the opposition to dilute the results. Did you see that's how they got Hillary to be the most Popular so and so woman recenty. She won with (only 16%) but it was skewed in her favor.

[weegee]

It's a well known fact that when you wish to skew the results you add only ONE of the party you wish to win and MANY of the opposition to dilute the results. Did you see that's how they got Hillary to be the most Popular so and so woman recenty. She won with (only 16%) but it was skewed in her favor.

The media Pushes Polls? Noooooo. Say it isn't so. < /sarcasm >

[Desert Wanderer]

Hmm, you mean kind of how like the AFA Marriage Poll had two choices (for gay marriage and for gay civil union) so as to split the pro-gay vote, but only one choice for the anti-gay side? (against any form of gay union)