[wizzler]

Sorry, it's not a lack of plug-ins that's causing the problem. It's the lack of design skill on your part. You clearly have no eye for logic and efficiency in presentation.

This is the way kids design their personal home pages when they first get their hands on some HTML coding. It's not the way it should be done by anybody who actually cares about communicating.

But perhaps you don't care about communicating -- after all, you actually type words like "ratiocination." If that's the case, then sure... Continue amusing yourself with these convoluted posts.

[Mia T]

You really must try to think out of the box.

As to "plug-in deficiency," think figuratively. I was referring to more than your apparent lack of the Flash player 6.

Design is a more subjective matter... aesthetically, each to his own taste, of course...

But as for the design-communication synergy of my posts... many in this venue and beyond do not have your comprehension problem.

As for efficiency in communicating, you really miss the point here. The web redefines communication. The bottom line isn't efficiency per se but effectiveness, i.e., the number of pairs of eyeballs that actually see and read and linger and ponder....

That is not to say my work isn't efficient. For sheer efficiency, it's hard to beat

Q ERTY4

or

or

or

or

or

American Gothics Hyperlinked

or

A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory

 

I can tell you that the traffic generated by some of my Flash movies on the clintons, e.g., COMING APART, have consistently maxed out the AOL server on which they reside. That's communication effectiveness, in my view.

Finally, as to your estimate of my "eye for logic," I can only point out that math degrees/advanced math studies and illogic are generally considered to be mutually exclusive constructs.