Posted on 09/30/2026 3:51:44 AM PDT by Merrick
The Trump administration is considering adding a citizenship and work authorization question to next year's federal tax return, while separately proposing rules that could restrict access to the full value of several tax credits for some immigrants who are legally allowed to live and work in the United States.
A draft of Form 1040 released by the Internal Revenue Service this month asks filers to check "Yes" or "No" to this question: "At the time you file your return, are you, and your spouse if filing jointly, a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, or an alien lawfully authorized to work in the U.S.?"
The administration says the question would help ensure tax benefits go to people eligible under the law, reports The New York Times on Tuesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
It’s nothing until it’s finally published. At the very least, it will have them talking about it: “Ay carumba!”
If I were to ask if you were a US citizen, would you say “yes”?
Umm... yes, because I am. I’m not sure what point you are trying to make.
That is my proposed wording of the citizen question. I won’t even go over the origin.
Judge to strike down in 3....2....1....
A man is told that at the end of a long hallway there are two doors. He must, upon pain of death exit through one of those doors. One door exits safely, the other door guarantees a painful death. There is a guard at each door. One guard will always lie, the other will never lie. How does the man choose the door to safety?
He must ask either guard, "If I were to ask you if yours is the door to safety, would you say yes?"
Since I am perfectly safe answering, “yes I am an American citizen,” I don’t suffer from the dilemma. The dilemma also does *NOT* exist for non-citizens who are here *LEGALLY*, with a *LEGAL* right to work, and who have *NOT* illegally voted.
For whom *does* the dilemma exist?
1. Anyone who is here illegally.
2. Anyone who is here legally but working illegally.
3. Anyone who votes illegally, regardless of whether or not they are or are not here legally and are or are not working legally.
So, sure, they have a dilemma. Glad to bring it to them.
But I don’t have a dilemma. So I am not sure why your question matters to *me*.
So, to be clear, there are no two guards for me, and I couldn’t care less what either says, and neither will touch me. I am an American citizen truthfully answering a simple question about my citizenship. I have ZERO DANGER in telling the truth.
Considering all the other things you need to prove in order to secure a refund, this questions seems mild.
And I like our odds at SCOTUS. We don’t win them all, but we win most.
Your puzzle is interesting - but it’s a completely irrelevant comparison to what this question represents for American citizens and non-citizens who are here legally and obeying the law. If you are neither, the question could pose a dilemma. But *that’s* the point.
This is a good move to further squeeze the illegals in the USA.
If an illegal does not file a 1040 tax return, then the illegal has committed a crime and can be deported.
If an illegal falsely claims citizenship, the illegal commits a crime and can be deported.
The Democrats like to make sure that everyone pays their fair share of income tax, so the Democrats should be in favor of making sure the illegals file a 1040.
Yep - and you and me and every other legal citizen and legal alien proudly check the box correctly and go about our lives.
Also, we’d be looking forever for someone who always lied and another who always told the truth. I was merely being snarky over the IRS’s “ways and means”.
Al Capone died in his mansion in Palm Island, Florida.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.