Posted on 09/17/2026 10:05:44 AM PDT by lasereye
After winning the Michigan Senate Democrat primary by falsely accusing his opponent of working for Israel, Abdul El-Sayed headed for a Pakistan Independence Day celebration.
At the Pakistan Association of America, El-Sayed spoke out for ousted Pakistani dictator Imran ‘Taliban’ Khan notorious for his persecution of Christians and for harboring Osama bin Laden.
The PAA had formerly been headed by Asad Malik who appears to have met in person with Khan and who also served as a board member at the Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee (PAKPAC): not to be confused with the American-Pakistani Political Action Committee (APPAC) which was later tied to extensive health care fraud in New York. PAKPAC endorsed Abdul El-Sayed and a PAKPAC fundraising event for the Islamist candidate set contribution levels up to $3,500 while keeping the location secret until the money was given.
(Last year, Malik was accused of sexual harassment by an employee who was then fired.)
PAKPAC vocally lobbied the Biden administration to help ousted dictator Imran Khan. It referred to a letter on behalf of the Islamic terrorist sympathizer signed by 60 members of Congress, including AOC, Rep. Ro Khanna, Rep. Jamie Raskin, and Rep. Ilhan Omar, calling Khan a “political prisoner”. Khan had hailed the Taliban takeover of Kabul as “breaking the chains of slavery” and described Osama bin Laden as a “martyr”.
This raises serious questions about congressional ties to a regime that harbored Osama. And Abdul El-Sayed’s appearance at the Pakistani event did nothing to relieve those concerns.
At the Pakistan celebration, Abdul El-Sayed complained about Egypt’s government, resented by Islamists for its suppression of the Muslim Brotherhood, the parent organization of both Al Qaeda and Hamas, and then murmured that “whatever one feels about the former prime minister of Pakistan”, democracy was not being allowed to operate in the Muslim country.
Why was Abdul El-Sayed so reluctant to name Imran Khan and so ambiguous about defending the Islamist politician who has become a cause celebre for Pakistani Islamists in America?
After the United States tracked down Osama bin Laden being harbored in a Pakistani military town and killed him, Khan had complained that “we Pakistanis were embarrassed when the Americans came into Abbottabad and killed Osama bin Laden, martyred him.”
The Pakistani legislature called the raid an attack on Pakistan and the commission looking into it ordered that charges of treason be filed against Dr. Shakeel Afridi, who had helped the CIA look for the Al Qaeda leader. Imran Khan defended the move, telling FOX News that “this is a very emotive issue, because Shakeel Afridi in Pakistan is considered a spy.”
There were reports that Pakistan had offered to trade the doctor for ‘Lady Al Qaeda’, Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani Muslim aiding Al Qaeda in America. Khan’s PTI party had urged “best efforts to bring prisoners like Dr. Afia Siddiqui and others back to Pakistan.”
Pakistani Islamists in America have continued to rally for Imran Khan and have been spreading money and influence around, including in Congress and to social media influencers, to stir up support for the Islamist butcher. For example, a conservative media outlet published an op-ed headlined, “Want to protect Pakistan’s Christians? Stand up for an imprisoned Muslim leader.”
Under Khan, Christians were assaulted and killed, accused of blasphemy against Mohammed, arrested and imprisoned. Khan’s government had reached an initial deal with Islamists not to free Asia Bibi: a Christian woman accused of blasphemy when Muslims refused to drink water that had been touched by a Christian. Under Khan’s brutal regime, thousands of Christian women and girls were kidnapped and forcibly ‘married’ to Muslim men.
This is the Pakistani regime that Abdul El-Sayed claimed represented real democracy.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Muslims suck up to muslims against all Infidels.
If the reason this DBag got “elected” is ‘cause he accused his opponent of working for Israel — his constituents deserve whatever he does to them.
Israel is an ally. If a possible candidate has some sort of obscure relationship with an ally and you oppose that, you are anti-Semitic and, like I said, deserve the ‘Ell you have chosen.
Get these F’n muzzys out of our country!
Democrats are doing the same thing we did in 22 with Senate Canidates.
Abdulrahman Mohamed El’Sayed is a Piker.
Charles Manson would be proud of Abdul El-Sayed as one of his own.
The one thing this anti- American Islamonazi deserves some credit for is how he doesn’t hide his commitment as an enemy- of- USA - and - Christianity
I see Kamel Toe is going to campaign in Michigan with this muzzie terrorist.
YES, all of them. If they die in the jihad they’re a martyr. If they survive the conquest, they have earned greater status. “We love death more than you love life”
Mentally ill MoFos.
The problem is not El Assad himself so much as the uninformed MI people who flock to him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.