Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Self-Inflicted "Nakba" vs the Jewish nakba of Islamist-Arab racism
At EoZ ^

Posted on 05/17/2026 7:58:47 AM PDT by Words Matter

Self-Inflicted Nakba vs the Jewish nakba of Arab racism.

**The "Self-Inflicted" Perspective** This displacement was voluntary. Often cited by some historians, the 1948 Palestinian exodus was a direct result of the Arab world's strategic choices.

**Main points:**

- **Rejection of the Partition Plan:** In 1947, the United Nations proposed splitting Mandatory Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. The Arab leadership rejected the plan, preferring instead to go to war to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state.

-**Arab pro-Nazism**

The direct result of Arab "Palestinian" leadership. Even after Mufti al-Husseini and his entourage was exiled, his leadership attempted a pro-Nazi coup in Iraq, incited the atrocious 1941 pogrom there, and later went on to work with Hitler in Berlin. All the same, the Arab masses’ sympathy for Hitler caused massive fear during the “200 Days of Dread.”

-**Islamic Arab racism**:

1947-1948, AHC's spokesperson Jamal Husseini explained Arab rejection based on the aim of 'Arab race homogeneity.'

- **Call for Evacuation:** The Arab leaders and media outlets actively urged Palestinian Arabs to flee their homes temporarily so that invading Arab armies could wipe out the newly declared State of Israel without civilian casualties.

- **The Original Meaning of the Term:** Scholars argue that the word Nakba (coined by Arab historian Constantin Zurayk) was initially used to describe the "catastrophe" of Arab military failure and pan-Arab disunity, rather than focusing purely on Palestinian 1948 event.

- **"War of Annihilation" / "Self-Defense":** The 1948 Arab-Israeli War is not an expulsion, but as a defensive victory against invading Arab armies who sought to "push Jews into the ocean".

- **"Arab Failure" / "Self-Inflicted":** The blame for the refugee crisis is on Arab leadership's rejection of the 1947 UN Partition Plan and the displacement is a consequence of poor strategic choices by neighboring Arab states rather than intentional Israeli actions.

- **"Jewish Nakba":** To draw attention to the persecution and pushing out of the Jewish populations from the Arab world, most of whom settled in Israel.

- **"Propaganda Campaign" / "Political Weapon":** The term "Nakba" itself is an ideological myth designed to delegitimize Israel's right to exist as a sovereign Jewish state.


TOPICS: History; Politics
KEYWORDS: 1948; arabism; arabnazis; islamism; islamofascism; israel; jewoshrefugees; mamdani; nakba; socalledpalestinians; swastikapalestine; ww2

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

Some notes:


1 posted on 05/17/2026 7:58:47 AM PDT by Words Matter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Words Matter
PMW video documentary: “Leave: The origins of Palestinian refugees” (in their own words)
2 posted on 05/17/2026 7:59:44 AM PDT by Words Matter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Words Matter
Daniel Rubenstein @paulrubens:
It is amazing how a poster made by a Zionist in 1936 has been repurposed as a symbol of Palestinian resistance to the idea that Israel should exist.

May 15, 2026

Mamdani shares 'Nakba Remembrance Day' post featuring Zionist-created art.
The video interview was accompanied by shots showcasing a “Visit Palestine” poster created by Frank Krausz in 1936. Krausz was a Holocaust survivor and a Zionist Jew. JPost, May 16, 2026.

3 posted on 05/17/2026 8:09:36 AM PDT by Freeleesy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Freeleesy; Words Matter

So how should we, as followers of Jesus, view the Nakba? And how do we navigate our compassion for the Palestinian people while also recognizing Israel’s place in God’s redemptive story? Let’s look at history and Scripture for some clarity.

Does believing in God’s promises to Israel mean we turn a blind eye to Palestinian suffering? Absolutely not. As believers, we are called to love all people — Jew and Arab alike.

https://firmisrael.org/learn/what-is-the-nakba-a-painful-history-through-gods-eyes/


4 posted on 05/17/2026 8:10:31 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege (🩰🌷 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Great links. Info


5 posted on 05/17/2026 8:14:03 AM PDT by Milagros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

As one once admittedly said: “the nakba is when Arabs failed to annihilate the Jews’


6 posted on 05/17/2026 8:17:41 AM PDT by Milagros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Words Matter
Palestinian culture, as shaped and sustained by its leadership for three generations, is not a story of victimhood imposed by outsiders. It is a monument to self-inflicted ruin, chronic denial, and a pathological refusal to accept responsibility for choices that turned opportunity into exile. The so-called “Nakba” — that sacred, untouchable myth of 1948 — was never an Israeli expulsion of a peaceful people. It was the direct, predictable consequence of Arab rejectionism, Nazi-sympathizing leadership, racist ideology, and a deliberate strategy of evacuation that backfired spectacularly. And ever since, Palestinian elites have fed their own people a toxic cocktail of lies to avoid admitting the truth: they lost because they chose annihilation over coexistence.

Start with the original sin: the 1947 UN Partition Plan. A reasonable compromise that would have given Arabs their own state alongside a tiny Jewish one. The Jewish leadership said yes. The Arab Higher Committee, the Mufti’s heirs, and every surrounding Arab regime said no — not because the plan was unfair, but because the mere existence of a Jewish state was intolerable. They chose war. They chose to “drive the Jews into the sea.” That choice created every refugee, every destroyed village, every inch of the catastrophe they now mourn. No one forced them to reject peace. They did it themselves.

And who led them? The same leadership drenched in Nazi poison. Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, didn’t just flirt with Hitler — he lived in Berlin, recruited Muslims for the SS, and helped plan the Final Solution’s extension into the Middle East. His followers in Iraq staged a pro-Nazi coup and the Farhud pogrom of 1941, slaughtering Jews in the streets while cheering the Reich. Even after the war, that same toxic current ran through Palestinian politics. When Arab armies invaded in 1948, they weren’t defending “Palestine.” They were finishing what the Mufti started: a war of annihilation explicitly framed as racial and religious cleansing. Jamal Husseini, the Arab Higher Committee’s spokesman, openly declared the goal was “Arab race homogeneity.” Read that again. This wasn’t about land or refugees. It was about erasing Jews because they were Jews.

Then came the evacuation orders — the part Palestinian propaganda pretends never happened. Arab leaders and radio broadcasts from Damascus, Cairo, and Baghdad explicitly told Palestinian Arabs to clear out so the invading armies could operate freely. “Leave your homes temporarily,” they promised. “Return after victory.” The victory never came. The armies were routed. And the people who obeyed those orders became refugees — not because Israelis expelled them en masse, but because their own leaders treated them as expendable cannon fodder in a holy war they lost.

The very term “Nakba” exposes the fraud. Coined by the Arab historian Constantin Zurayk in 1948, it described the Arab military failure and pan-Arab disunity — the shame of being beaten by a handful of Jews. Only later was it cynically repurposed as a Palestinian-specific tale of Israeli villainy. The myth was born in defeat and perfected as propaganda: a political weapon designed to delegitimize Israel’s existence rather than confront Arab strategic incompetence.

Meanwhile, the real Nakba — the Jewish Nakba — gets memory-holed. Between 1948 and the 1970s, nearly 900,000 Jews were driven out of Arab and Muslim lands: Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Libya, Algeria. They lost homes, businesses, synagogues, and centuries of history. They arrived in Israel penniless and were absorbed. No UNRWA perpetuating refugee status for grandchildren. No international propaganda machine. No culture of eternal grievance. They built a state. The contrast is grotesque: one side turned defeat into nation-building; the other turned defeat into a death cult of victimhood, UN resolutions, and “right of return” fantasies that amount to demographic suicide for Israel. This is the rotten core of Palestinian political culture: a leadership that has never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity. From the Mufti to Arafat to Hamas, the pattern is identical — reject every peace offer, incite the next war, lose, then scream “Nakba” while keeping their people in misery as political props. Camp after camp, generation after generation, fed the same lie: It’s always someone else’s fault. Never the rejection of 1947. Never the 1948 invasion. Never the 1967 war they started. Never the 2000 Camp David walkout. Never the rockets, the suicide bombings, the October 7 massacre. The Jewish state absorbed its refugees and moved on. Palestinian leadership weaponized theirs and never let them move on. That is not tragedy. That is strategy. A strategy of perpetual grievance that has poisoned Palestinian society, turned schools into indoctrination factories, and turned summer camps into terror training grounds. The Nakba myth isn’t history — it’s a shield against accountability and a sword against Jewish legitimacy.

Until Palestinian culture discards this self-serving lie and confronts the truth — that the catastrophe was self-inflicted by their own leaders’ racism, Nazi nostalgia, and strategic idiocy — there will be no peace. Only more Nakbas, all of them avoidable, all of them blamed on the Jews who refused to die on command. The Jewish Nakba was real ethnic cleansing. The Palestinian one was a choice. History recorded both. Only one side refuses to read the page.

7 posted on 05/17/2026 10:02:26 AM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson