Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump 2020 Election Lawyer John Eastman Disbarred in California For Challenging Democrat Fraud
Gateway Pundit ^ | 4/15/26 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 04/16/2026 9:27:35 AM PDT by Regulator

President Trump’s 2020 election lawyer John Eastman was officially disbarred in Californian on Wednesday.

The California Supreme Court affirmed that Eastman was disbarred after a two-year battle with the state bar.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 01herecomes; 02whiningtdscrowd; california; cheating; courts; coverup; democratcorruption; democratfraud; democrats; disbarred; eastman; law; rigging; stolenelection

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
More residue from 2020 election fraud. The Stalinist California Supreme Court upholds the equally Stalinist State Bar Association's show trial disbarment of John Eastman.

Lotsa people on this forum regurgitate this as if it was legitimate, but it's not. It was just part of the massive suppression campaign by Pelosi's gangsters in the wake of the Big Steal.

1 posted on 04/16/2026 9:27:35 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Has Trump done anything to help this very honest and loyal man?


2 posted on 04/16/2026 9:29:23 AM PDT by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

The California Supreme Court ruled in 2014 that undocumented immigrants can be licensed to practice law in California if they pass the bar exam.

- Google AI


3 posted on 04/16/2026 9:34:53 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Everything about Democrat jurists is political. What are the odds they would have disbarred an attorney if this was a case of a lawyer challenging an election a Republican President won? Zero to none


4 posted on 04/16/2026 9:36:46 AM PDT by chuckee (As Hillary sa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

And I note that this is the current makeup of the California State Supreme Court (from Wokipedia):

“There are two African American (Kruger and Evans) justices, one East Asian American justice (Liu), two non-Hispanic white justices (Corrigan, Groban) and one Latina (Guerrero)”

The single “non-hispanic” White male is of course Jewish...meaning there is no White Christian male on the court, much less a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant male like John Eastman himself.

Just never call it discrimination or retribution!

Linky:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_California


5 posted on 04/16/2026 9:37:34 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

The entire Democratic Party
is a RICO Criminal Operation


6 posted on 04/16/2026 9:37:38 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They Did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

It may not happen for five or ten years, but this lawyer will be suing the ass off of California when the truth about the 2020 election comes out.


7 posted on 04/16/2026 9:38:04 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Asshat the Piker needs to get his domestic terrorist ass out of my country. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Advanced false claims? Couldn’t that be said of every attorney who loses in court or has a motion denied?


8 posted on 04/16/2026 9:39:36 AM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

The Communist Socialist Democrat country of California....


9 posted on 04/16/2026 9:40:18 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

Any lawyer who challenged Trump’s victory would probably get an award from the American Bar Association.
🙁


10 posted on 04/16/2026 9:40:32 AM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
In the 50 or so suits where Trump as asked for a recount or examination of ballots, he lost every one. It's not that Trump can't prove fraud in the 2020 election. He's been denied access to the evidence that would settle the question once and for all. If there was no fraud, why not let him access the evidence? Also, where did the 23 million "extra" Democrat votes come from in 2020? It runs near 65 million for two decades and all of a sudden it jumps 23 million votes! How?
11 posted on 04/16/2026 9:41:34 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I honestly don’t know.

Eastman was the brains behind the resistance operation in 2020, and since then...hard to say.

It would be great to see him get appointed as a Federal judge or be the next SCOTUS appointee but I think that tells us all why Thune is preventing recess appointments. The dishrags in DC are afraid of the “optics” and don’t want a confirmation battle. Gets in the way of the looting.

But so far Trump has not hinted that he might put him up for something, so the blocking action seems to be working for the dishrag contingent.


12 posted on 04/16/2026 9:45:05 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

There’s quite a few states where you can practice law if didn’t go to law school and you pass the bar.


13 posted on 04/16/2026 9:49:12 AM PDT by Oneder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

John Eastman has very good civil rights lawsuit case he can pursue.


14 posted on 04/16/2026 9:50:07 AM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

It looks like the push to avenge 2020 is moving into a higher gear and likely he could be part of that.

Undoubtedly Eastman will pursue federal relief if he can.


15 posted on 04/16/2026 9:57:21 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: econjack

“How?”

Widespread discontent with Orange Man Bad according to the Rats, who of course have no answer for why Their Guy mysteriously decided to drop out of the 2024 election..or rather the sock puppet who spoke for him said he did...


16 posted on 04/16/2026 9:59:55 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Time to bam the democrat party, one civil war is all you get.


17 posted on 04/16/2026 10:03:42 AM PDT by SecondAmendment (Political insight on loan from Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
> If there was no fraud, why not let him access the evidence?

I assume that was a rhetorical question since you answered it yourself...

18 posted on 04/16/2026 10:05:43 AM PDT by SecondAmendment (Political insight on loan from Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

With 65 million Democrats to choose from in 2020, Harris was the best option? That’s a sad commentary when one considers she can’t speak a cogent sentence without a teleprompter. “Word Salad” is too focused for her...”Word Buffet” seems more fitting.


19 posted on 04/16/2026 10:06:48 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Project 65 is behind this effort to strike fear into lawyers for representing Republican clients in election disputes. It strikes at the heart of the 6th amendment by dissuading lawyers to represent. the 6th Amendment: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
20 posted on 04/16/2026 10:10:33 AM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson