Trump 2020 Election Lawyer John Eastman Disbarred in California For Challenging Democrat Fraud

Gateway Pundit ^ | 4/15/26 | Cristina Laila

[Regulator]

President Trump’s 2020 election lawyer John Eastman was officially disbarred in Californian on Wednesday.

The California Supreme Court affirmed that Eastman was disbarred after a two-year battle with the state bar.

[Regulator]

More residue from 2020 election fraud. The Stalinist California Supreme Court upholds the equally Stalinist State Bar Association's show trial disbarment of John Eastman.

Lotsa people on this forum regurgitate this as if it was legitimate, but it's not. It was just part of the massive suppression campaign by Pelosi's gangsters in the wake of the Big Steal.

[DesertRhino]

Has Trump done anything to help this very honest and loyal man?

[SpaceBar]

The California Supreme Court ruled in 2014 that undocumented immigrants can be licensed to practice law in California if they pass the bar exam.

- Google AI

[chuckee]

Everything about Democrat jurists is political. What are the odds they would have disbarred an attorney if this was a case of a lawyer challenging an election a Republican President won? Zero to none

[Regulator]

And I note that this is the current makeup of the California State Supreme Court (from Wokipedia):

“There are two African American (Kruger and Evans) justices, one East Asian American justice (Liu), two non-Hispanic white justices (Corrigan, Groban) and one Latina (Guerrero)”

The single “non-hispanic” White male is of course Jewish...meaning there is no White Christian male on the court, much less a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant male like John Eastman himself.

Just never call it discrimination or retribution!

Linky:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_California

[SaveFerris]

The entire Democratic Party
is a RICO Criminal Operation

[FlingWingFlyer]

It may not happen for five or ten years, but this lawyer will be suing the ass off of California when the truth about the 2020 election comes out.

[rey]

Advanced false claims? Couldn’t that be said of every attorney who loses in court or has a motion denied?

[JBW1949]

The Communist Socialist Democrat country of California....

[Leaning Right]

Any lawyer who challenged Trump’s victory would probably get an award from the American Bar Association.
🙁

[econjack]

In the 50 or so suits where Trump as asked for a recount or examination of ballots, he lost every one. It's not that Trump can't prove fraud in the 2020 election. He's been denied access to the evidence that would settle the question once and for all. If there was no fraud, why not let him access the evidence? Also, where did the 23 million "extra" Democrat votes come from in 2020? It runs near 65 million for two decades and all of a sudden it jumps 23 million votes! How?

[Regulator]

I honestly don’t know.

Eastman was the brains behind the resistance operation in 2020, and since then...hard to say.

It would be great to see him get appointed as a Federal judge or be the next SCOTUS appointee but I think that tells us all why Thune is preventing recess appointments. The dishrags in DC are afraid of the “optics” and don’t want a confirmation battle. Gets in the way of the looting.

But so far Trump has not hinted that he might put him up for something, so the blocking action seems to be working for the dishrag contingent.

[WASCWatch]

John Eastman has very good civil rights lawsuit case he can pursue.

[Regulator]

It looks like the push to avenge 2020 is moving into a higher gear and likely he could be part of that.

Undoubtedly Eastman will pursue federal relief if he can.

[Regulator]

“How?”

Widespread discontent with Orange Man Bad according to the Rats, who of course have no answer for why Their Guy mysteriously decided to drop out of the 2024 election..or rather the sock puppet who spoke for him said he did...

[SecondAmendment]

Time to bam the democrat party, one civil war is all you get.

[SecondAmendment]

> If there was no fraud, why not let him access the evidence?

I assume that was a rhetorical question since you answered it yourself...

[econjack]

With 65 million Democrats to choose from in 2020, Harris was the best option? That’s a sad commentary when one considers she can’t speak a cogent sentence without a teleprompter. “Word Salad” is too focused for her...”Word Buffet” seems more fitting.

[ALPAPilot]

Project 65 is behind this effort to strike fear into lawyers for representing Republican clients in election disputes. It strikes at the heart of the 6th amendment by dissuading lawyers to represent. the 6th Amendment: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."