Judge Delivers 1st Amendment Victory Protecting Communications of Pro-Life Organization

Liberty Daily ^ | 4/9/26 | Bob Unruh

[CFW]

A federal judge in Idaho has delivered an order protecting the private communications of a pro-life organization that was hit with a subpoena for that information even though it was not party to a lawsuit brought against the state by a group of abortion promoters.

It was the Northwest Abortion Access Fund, the Indigenous Idaho Alliance and others who had been in court demanding access to the communications of the Right to Life of Idaho, Inc.

Magistrate Judge Debora Grasham quashed, or canceled, the subpoena, determining that the abortionists’ insistence on the subpoena because it would help them overcome “inefficiency, cost, scope, and timing,” could not “justify infringement on the First Amendment rights asserted at this time.”

“The First Amendment does not magically cease to exist in civil litigation discovery,” explained James Bopp Jr., of the Bopp Law Firm which represents RTLI.

“The court correctly recognized that a party cannot overcome its protections of speech and association by simply filing a lawsuit—particularly when that party has not even tried to take simple, reasonable steps to obtain the discovery in a manner that does not implicate the First Amendment at all. The court correctly stopped the plaintiffs’ attempt to force RTLI, their ideological opponent, to hand over its private communications.”

The case involved is Matsumoto v. Labrado, in which abortion interests are contesting an Idaho law that bars the trafficking of minors for abortion.

Even though Right to Life was not part of the legal case, the pro-abortion activists had targeted the organization with a subpoena last fall, “attempting to dig through RTLI’s communications and records. The subpoena demanded that RTLI, which was not even a party to the case, provide years’ worth of its communications with legislators concerning Idaho House Bills 242 and 98.”

---

TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; abortion; courts; prolife

[CFW]

Correct ruling from the judge.

[Tell It Right]

Good news! I just wish the good guy judges would call them “federal injunctions” to give them more weight like the left does.

[CFW]

“Good news! I just wish the good guy judges would call them “federal injunctions” to give them more weight like the left does.”

---

Conservative judges are usually less likely to swerve out of their lane than the leftist activist judges.