NASA chief Jared Isaacman announces NASA Force to recruit top talent [7:46]

YouTube transcript reformatted at textformatter.ai follows.

I didn't like the sound of this.

Transcript
It's great to be here with so many entrepreneurs, operators, investors, and policymakers who are helping us build the next golden age of space exploration. I love being around the people who not only look up and imagine what is possible, but possess the experiences and the will to bring ideas into reality.

There is no organization I can tell you that appreciates that kind of determination more than NASA. On that note, in the weeks ahead, America will send the brave Artemis 2 astronauts potentially farther into space than any humans have ever traveled in generations, flying around the moon on a 10-day mission to test the Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft before returning home to Earth.

Now President Donald Trump took the decisive steps of establishing the Artemis program during his first term. He recently, in fact, was the day that I was sworn into this position, reaffirmed America's commitment to space superiority, giving NASA a clear mandate and a focus to return to the moon, build the base, so this time, we return to stay.

Thanks to historic investments secured in the Working Families Tax Credit Act, NASA has received nearly $10 billion in support of that national imperative. The bipartisan commitment signed into law by the President gives us the resources to move forward with purpose and urgency, knowing American leadership in the high ground of space is on the line.

So we have the presidential mandate, we have the resources, we certainly have the historic experience, we have plenty of hardware, we have domestic and international partners. So why does it all take so long? Why does it cost so much? And what are we going to do about it?

So lots of those answers are because we have lacked real competition for decades. You know, after the last space race, we were the only game in town. So we build partnerships all over the world to spread goodwill. We spread ourselves thin with broad-based science. We took on lots of side quest projects, some of which are very cool, but ultimately distract from the world-changing mission that taxpayers have entrusted us with.

It costs a lot because we outsourced a lot of our core competencies. Industry consolidated, we let stakeholders set the priorities to serve constituent interests and adopted policies in the attempt to make everyone happy, maybe make everyone happy other than the American people and really people all over the world that were waiting for the headlines that only NASA was capable of making.

As a result, you get moon rockets that fly only every 3+ years, the worst cadence by far of NASA designed rockets, hardware that is obsolete by the time it's delivered, 51 nuclear propulsion programs that have never flown, less flagship science and discovery missions, less X-planes, less astronauts in space, less kids dressing up as astronauts for Halloween. I don't like this. President Trump doesn't like it. Clearly, President Trump doesn't like it and doesn't like it given what he's trying to accomplish in national space policy, but maybe this was tolerable to some when there was no geopolitical rivals capable of challenging America in the most important strategic domain, but that's not the case anymore, not anymore.

NASA has stated we will achieve the national imperative to return to the moon and establish an enduring presence before the end of President Trump's term. Now, our rival has stated before 2030. So it's not hard math. That's less than one year of margin, and they might be early. And if recent history says anything, we certainly might be late. President Trump does not like to lose, and if I'm doing my job right at NASA, that won't happen.

Now, I've spent the first few months getting my arms around the challenges and the opportunities, and it generally revolves around ensuring that the extraordinary resources that are made available. I mean, NASA's budget is $25 billion a year, and concentrating them on the most pressing objectives. Clearing out needless bureaucracy and really any obstacles that impede progress to empower the workforce, and make sure our capital allocation is done in a thoughtful way that ensures desired outcomes are achieved and ideally ahead of schedule.

So to that end, we are standardizing the SLS rocket, increasing launch cadence from years to months. We're inserting a new mission in 2027 to buy down risk and increase confidence for lunar landing attempts in 2028. As I've said many times, Artemis is a program where we begin with SLS is not where we end. There will be dozens of missions living on long past where Apollo 17 ended, with the aim of affordable and repeatable crew and cargo missions to the surface for decades into the future.

We're also going to stop leaping right to the dream state as a service. And build a moon base step by step in an evolutionary approach. We're going to start with CLIPS programs and LTV style landers and rovers. We're going to provide a strong demand signal to industry for launch, landers, rovers that we can outfit with power, navigation, communication, surface improvement capabilities, scientific and other capabilities that we can experiment with to ultimately inform the phase two infrastructure and move towards long-term habitation.

So the folks in this room, if you're ever coming to pitch me on the Mars-based dream state as a service where the only customer is NASA, costs billions of dollars, and it's never been done before, I can assure you we probably won't be that receptive. We're not going to force an orbital economy where it doesn't exist, but I can certainly provide a demand signal for what we need in line with President Trump's national space policy, and we are going to do everything we possibly can to ignite the space economy that we all know is inevitable.

When we return to the moon, America will not look down on the prime lunar real estate while our rivals occupy it. NASA astronauts will be on the surface, building President Trump's moon base, and we will realize the scientific, economic, and national security potential surface operations provide. NASA will achieve the lunar objectives and do the other things. We will invest in nuclear power and propulsion in space so we can undertake the next giant leap to Mars. We will ignite the orbital economy and launch more missions of science and discovery.

We never pursue these grand endeavors alone. We have international partners, we have commercial industry like many of those in this room, but we also require the scientific, the software development, the engineering, technical and operational talent to execute on the mission.

So I'm pleased to announce with the immense support of OPM Director Scott Cooper, we are launching NASA Force to rebuild NASA's core competencies. These term-based appointments from industry partners will provide mentorship and training and help season and rebuild the core competencies within the NASA workforce. Similarly, these programs offer exchange opportunities for NASA talent to rotate through industry.

At NASA, we have no excuses. We have the policy, the resources, the will, the support of the most technologically forward-leaning industry, and we have the winning playbook that achieved the near impossible on July 20th, 1969. It starts with having a very focused plan, concentrating resources again on the most challenging objectives, staying organized, assembling the best and brightest from around the nation, instilling a culture in them that requires immense competence, extreme ownership and urgency, partnering with industry, taking meaningful steps towards a larger goal, constantly listening to data and learning and never accepting defeat.

This is how NASA once changed the world. And this is how we're going to do it again. Thank you.

Oh my...so DEI must be still a factor. I’ll read your transcript tomorrow.

Musk surely has to deal with it in his companies...but in such a way as to not retard his workforce in critical areas.

BREAKING! SpaceOne Kairos-3 Launch from Japan Breaks Up In Flight [3:10] [03/05/2026]
Curiosity Raw Images Sol 4816: Right Navigation Camera [03/04/2026]
NASA repairs Artemis 2 moon rocket in hopes of an April lunar launch [03/04/2026]
SpaceX Starship: Flight 12 Ship 39 Reveals A Secret Trick! [21:37] [03/03/2026]
Total Lunar Eclipse Broadcast -- March 3, 2026 [03/03/2026]

Why not?
Sounds very good to me.

It’s not about the DEI, it’s about make-work pork-barrel crap. As long as it’s just an election year ploy, I can live with it (not that anyone asked). The vast expansion of NASA employment during the Moon Race really got it done; OTOH, those engineers and techies were super’ed and trained and educated by the generation that developed and got things operational in short time frames during the 3 years 8 months of US participation in WWII. They didn’t worry about who they hired. There’s a short discussion of the drawbacks of what we now call DEI in Chuck Yeager’s memoir.

Yeager: An Autobiography by Chuck Yeager
https://www.thriftbooks.com/a/chuck-yeager/248163/

I liked the remark about how the way to build the program was to increase launch cadence, but expanding the payroll is clearly just the monkeys and typewriters approach, and the launch cadence isn't going to improve. The Bush-era program had its plug pulled by Zero early in his occupation regime; had the Kenyan born muzzie gotten behind it, it's fairly likely that there would already be a permanent American presence on the Moon. That big booster was more capable than the current SLS, and both are Shuttle-derived -- it's just that the folks familiar with the Shuttle were a lot more familiar with it back then, and are probably retired by now.

Read something about Isaacman.
He's a tough entrepreneur who built a multi billion dollar company starting when he was in his teens.
He's going to employ the best of the best.
He's not another Biden out employing unfit people because they have dark skin because of DEI.

I’m familiar with Isaacman. Whatever he did in the past isn’t as important as the role he has now, which is to run a gubmint agency. I’ve said before that he’s the right guy for the job, and he’s said that the $20 billion NASA budget will be sufficient. Unless he’s going to build a compound to H1B a bunch of furriners to do the work without letting them wander around, he’ll be relying on SpaceX to raise the launch cadence. No other company has shown any ability to raise it.