Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SpaceX Said to Consider Merger With Tesla or xAI [4:57]
YouTube ^ | January 30, 2026 | Bloomberg Technology

Posted on 01/30/2026 5:48:12 PM PST by SunkenCiv

SpaceX is considering a potential merger with either Tesla or xAI, according to people familiar with the matter. Bloomberg's Loren Grush and Kiel Porter break down what this possible consolidation of Elon Musk's empire could mean with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on "Bloomberg Tech." 
SpaceX Said to Consider Merger With Tesla or xAI | 4:57 
Bloomberg Technology | 715K subscribers | 10,262 views | January 30, 2026
SpaceX Said to Consider Merger With Tesla or xAI | 4:57 | Bloomberg Technology | 715K subscribers | 10,262 views | January 30, 2026

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: business; elonmusk; investing; ipo; spacex; starlink; tesla; xai

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

SpaceX is said to be considering a potential merger with Tesla or xAI, as Elon Musk weighs how to consolidate his empire. Bloomberg Tech's Ed Ludlow discusses what's at stake on "Bloomberg: The Asia Trade."
Musk's SpaceX Said to Weigh Tie-Up With Tesla or xAI | 2:09
Bloomberg Technology | 715K subscribers | 887 views | January 30, 2026
Musk's SpaceX Said to Weigh Tie-Up With Tesla or xAI | 2:09 | Bloomberg Technology | 715K subscribers | 887 views | January 30, 2026

1 posted on 01/30/2026 5:48:12 PM PST by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

2 posted on 01/30/2026 5:49:04 PM PST by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Why? That’s not needed and could well be detrimental long term.


3 posted on 01/30/2026 5:52:31 PM PST by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA-PRO-MAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

A more interesting question is why?


4 posted on 01/30/2026 5:53:21 PM PST by TheDon (Remember the J6 political prisoners! Remember Ashli Babbitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

It easier than doing an IPO.


5 posted on 01/30/2026 5:54:39 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

That’s right!


6 posted on 01/30/2026 5:54:54 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

That’s true.


7 posted on 01/30/2026 5:55:09 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

It will still be private.


8 posted on 01/30/2026 6:02:12 PM PST by TexasGator (11.1I1i')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Why?


9 posted on 01/30/2026 6:05:32 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Yes, exactly. The entire edifice would be traded as Tesla until such time as the corporate name is changed.

Meanwhile, having been chastised in the past by the SEC or FTC or something, Elon Musk is clearly not going to respond to questions about this from media.

In the future, after such a merger, the various divisions could be spun out to "unlock value" as the term goes.

Currently, the only way I know to get a piece of the SpaceX action is to have a cool million to invest in BFGIX.

10 posted on 01/30/2026 6:17:21 PM PST by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Tesla would be the “surviving” company. They would do an “all stock deal” and issue shares to cover the cost.

In the end, Tesla goes up; Space Ex is Public, and Elon is a Trillionaire.


11 posted on 01/30/2026 6:42:41 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

RONB


12 posted on 01/30/2026 7:02:00 PM PST by GOPJ (Trump's a Rorschach: for good or ill people see thier hidden selves in him. Protector? Bully? Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I would understand Tesla and Xai, but SpaceX joining them is less obvious to me. Maybe there’s a synergy with the robots and Ai in space, and on Mars, that’s more easily served within one company, instead of cross company contracts?


13 posted on 01/30/2026 7:23:37 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Tesla isn’t private.

The most probable reason is to retain complete control in Musk’s hands. Next is that boosting Tesla earnings makes his $1 trillion pay package more likely. Also, if the companies are related, pricing on intercompany sales is more flexible.


14 posted on 01/30/2026 10:25:25 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson