It may be too late for Wikipedia to save itself. AI is killing Wikipedia and Wikipedia is quickly becoming irrelevant, like the AOL mail box.
Posted on 12/21/2025 1:54:46 PM PST by Words Matter
Asking Grok:
Who is the editor on Wikipedia that added the Yuval Abraham/TheGuardian silly idea and false conclusion, that since only 8,900 terrorists were named, everyone else (in Hamas’ MoH’ offered list of casualties) “must be” a “civilian?
Grok answers:
The Wikipedia editor who added the content referencing Yuval Abraham and The Guardian’s reporting on the 8,900 named combatants (implying the remainder of casualties reported by the Gaza Ministry of Health were civilians) is Iskandar323. This aligns with their history of actively editing Israel-Palestine conflict pages, including the “Casualties of the Gaza war” article, and incorporating sources like The Guardian._
1. Yes, **Iskandar323** is the Wikipedia editor who created the “**Nakba denial**” article in 2023 and nominated it for “Did you know” status on the main page. He was also highly active in its development and defense during discussions. Additionally, Iskandar323 initiated the 2024 Request for Comment (RfC) that led to the **Anti-Defamation League (ADL)** being deemed “generally unreliable” on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (and marginally unreliable on antisemitism unrelated to Israel/Zionism), where he was one of the most vocal participants arguing against the ADL’s reliability.—
2. Yes, in **March 2025** (specifically around March 18), the **ADL** released a report titled “Editing for Hate,” alleging that a coordinated group of at least **30 Wikipedia editors** had engaged in bad-faith editing for years (some dating back to 2002), introducing anti-Israel bias, downplaying Palestinian antisemitism and violence, and spreading misleading information, in violation of Wikipedia policies. The report highlighted antisemitic and anti-Israel narratives in articles. This followed Wikipedia’s own actions in January 2025, where several editors (including Iskandar323) were topic-banned from Israel-Palestine-related content.
3. The prominent source prominently featured in the “**Nakba denial**” article’s “Did you know” nomination and discussions is Maha **Nassar**’s 2023 paper: “Exodus, Nakba Denialism, and the Mobilization of Anti-Arab Racism” in *Critical Sociology*. Maha Nassar is a Palestinian-American associate professor of Middle Eastern history at the University of Arizona; there is no public information indicating she is Muslim, though her Arab heritage and focus on Palestinian history are well-documented in academic profiles.
Here’s a possible title that sums up the provided information:
“Iskandar323’s Controversial Role in Shaping Wikipedia’s Israel-Palestine Narratives and ‘Nakba Denial’ Edit Campaign”.
This title covers the major points of the Wikipedia editor’s involvement in shaping certain narratives around the Israel-Palestine conflict, their campaign around Nakba denial, and their connection to the ADCs exposure of biased editing. It also hints at the involvement of controversial figures and sources like Maha Nassar.
Wiki has a lot of “cheek” in continuing to ask for donations.
They totally need to clean their woke house.
Wikipedia is insanely biased on many thousands of topics—not just political ones.
On the political side they represent this doctrine:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality
On the philosophical side they are scientific materialists.
The combination of these two doctrines makes them fanatical advocates.
It is so annoying the aggressive pop-ups it has been going on for so long
Zackly.
Cremastra describes himself as:
https://archive.is/jtqdn
* Social liberal
* This user believes that Trumpism is the new Fascism.
* This user thinks the current British Labour government (AKA, liberal anti conservatives and pro "palestinian" Kier Starmer) is a right-wing travesty. *
You need to tell GROK that you only want facts. His predictive analysis sucks at best.
I asked AI Overview if the programmers who program AI are biased. They said “yes”.
Since AI relies on printed material like wikipedia and news sources to come to conclusions how could it possibly be intelligent?
Bingo
Good research.
It’s like HAL found a girlfriend.
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.