Nine senators who previously were targeted by Jack Smith and Arctic Frost subpoenas likely stand to make millions from lawsuits under the legislation.Posted on 11/20/2025 10:08:34 AM PST by SoConPubbie
As noted last week, the Senate included a provision in the government reopening bill to allow Republican Senators to sue the DOJ and data providers who comply with subpoenas for senator’s telephone and email records.
Nine senators who previously were targeted by Jack Smith and Arctic Frost subpoenas likely stand to make millions from lawsuits under the legislation.
In the latest round of DC pretending, the House voted 426-0 to repeal that specific law and terminate the Senate payday. Is the Senate going to take up the bill, of course not. However, the House now has another useless talking point (strong in the pearl clutching is this one) to campaign and fundraise with.
House members are great actors, very upset – very, and their level of pretense is excellent on this repeal bill. The unanimous vote really gives both wings of the uniparty, that reach across the aisle, a selling feature for the next election.
WASHINGTON DC – The House unanimously voted 426-0 Wednesday night to claw back language in last week’s government funding bill that could award some GOP senators hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages for having their phone records unknowingly obtained by former special counsel Jack Smith.
The language, which was quietly slipped into the shutdown-ending package last week by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, drove bipartisan outrage in the House. Even outspoken critics of Smith — including House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who is leading an investigation into the Biden-era probe — supported the effort to repeal a politically toxic measure that was quickly branded as a taxpayer-funded windfall for a select few.
“That policy, in my opinion — in the opinion I think of all the members of this institution — is unacceptable,” said House Administration Committee chair Bryan Steil (R-Wis.), during floor debate. “No one should be able to enrich themselves because the federal government wronged them, no elected official should be able to.”
The provision would allow senators to sue the federal government for $500,000 or more if their electronic data was subpoenaed without proper notification. But there are concerns over the language’s retroactivity — which would extend protections to at least eight Republican senators whose records were obtained as part of Smith’s investigation into Donald Trump’s attempts to subvert the 2020 election results.
There are no guarantees the bill to repeal the language will get a vote in the Senate. (read more)
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
So how will the Senate go?
Shouldn’t they be suing the phone companies instead?
For obeying a judge’s order?
The Judges need to be de-funded.
And defrocked.
After they voted for it and knowing the Senate won’t vote to repeal it.
More profiles in courage.
Literally no one in DC cares if Fed.gov has to pay $millions, $billions or even $trillions
PEOPLE, like Jack Smith and Merrick Garland, should be held responsible.
Would a new Law fall into being, “EX POST FACTO?”
Unconstitutional, sorry.
“”I wonder which Senators were responsible for inserting this language into the bill?””
Perhaps not a Senator...If you like to read, check out “The Zero Game” by Brad Meltzer - fiction - but MAYBE more truth than fiction..I wouldn’t be surprised if it was real life.
Staff members on Appropriations - inserting language in bills and betting on whether anyone notices before the vote is taken. Bets are disguised in code and delivered around the Capitol by House or Senate Pages and only a few are in on the game and no one knows who all the players are.
I bought the paperback used and was ready to put it in my “give away “ pile when I decided to give it another try and glad I did...fun reading - everything needed for a good mystery thriller!
MORE EVIDENCE THAT EVERY BILL SHOULD BE A “STAND ALONE BILL”.
The Senators can sue the perps in their individual capacity. There is evidence that they violated RICO statutes. Can also sue the telecom companies that gave the information to the government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.