PANIC IN THE SWAMP - Exposing the pivotal roles of Foreign Intelligence agencies in the Crime of the Century, a profound betrayal of the American public by their government underscores the urgent necessity for a SC

The one area the Government and the legacy media intentionally ignore is the significant roles played by Foreign Intelligence Agencies, particularly British Intelligence, in the Russia Hoax Conspiracy. The newly released 100 pages of declassified documents by Director of National Intelligence Gabbard and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) report implicated President Obama and Obama-era officials in an election interference scheme. What is conspicuously absent from their reports is the roles Foreign Intelligence Agencies, particularly British Intelligence, played in the Russia Hoax Conspiracy. 12345

Let's begin by looking at the origins of the Russia Gate Conspiracy and the roles played by those within the Foreign Intelligence Agencies' "Five Eyes Intelligence Network," specifically British Intelligence, who started this whole cabal by constructing the "BIG LIE," a deliberate and misleading narrative, and THE MYTH THAT TRUMP AND HIS CAMPAIGN TEAM HAD SECRET TIES TO THE RUSSIANS, a false accusation that has had profound and far-reaching consequences.

The origins of the myth began in 2015, when the Five Eyes Intelligence Network, a cooperative intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, specifically British Intelligence, was monitoring Russian Communications through Signals Intelligence and Cryptography (SIGINT) of conversations between Russian Officials discussing then-presidential candidate Trump.

The allegations that Trump had secret ties to Moscow originated from SIGINT intercepts of Russian Officials by British Intelligence, which became the basis for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) intelligence probes and investigations into the Trump campaign, claiming that Trump had secret ties to Moscow.

Anonymous sources within the National Security agencies leaked false narratives to the media that some of the information in the Steele dossier about Trump was corroborated, claiming the information came from intercepts of Russian officials. The facts from Special Counsel (SC) John Durham's investigation determined that the information for the the Steele dossier came from associates within the Clinton and DNC orbits, not the Russians, as part of their Machiavellian plan of making the Russians the responsible party to hide their criminality in framing Trump and his team for crimes they didn't commit. 67

***Have they asked British Intelligence to supply documents? Are the Brits cooperating at all***

the Foreign Intelligence Agencies' "Five Eyes Intelligence Network," specifically British Intelligence, who started this whole cabal by constructing the "BIG LIE," ***

This report is inaccurate and misleading. While it is reasonable to suspect British MI6 (SIS) involvement, I have seen no evidence of direct MI6 involvement - suspicious connections, yes, but not direct input.

The report states: 'British Intelligence, who started this whole cabal by constructing the "BIG LIE,"' is meaningless. What does the writer mean by 'the Big Lie'? If that refers to the lie that Trump had communications with the Russians concerning the 2016 elections, I have seen nothing credible to that effect. If the 'big lie' refers to the Steele dossier, Steele was always identified as a 'retired' SIS operative acting on his own. The Steele 'dossier' was admittedly of low credibility, only accepted because high U.S. intelligence officers overrode analysts warnings in order to use it to justify bogus FISA warrants.

One other loose connection with MI6 was Stephan Halper, a retired Reagan era spook who was teaching at Cambridge University in Britain. He was involved in early 2016 with the FBI European operation dealing with General Michael Flynn (he tried to set Flynn up in a Russian 'honey trap') and Trump foreign aides George Papadopoulos and Carter Page. We know of nothing connecting any of these operations directly with MI6 - other than an Australian diplomat to Britain appeared to try to trap Carter Page in a Russian leaked information trap.

Nothing that we know of came from all this other than a bunch of bogus FISA warrants. British MI6 has plausible deniability in ALL of this.

Absolutely Not – Senators Graham and Cornyn Ask DOJ to Appoint Special Counsel to Investigate President Obama and Intelligence Weaponization Against Trump

July 24, 2025 | Sundance

~Understanding Silos 101~

Senator Lindsey Graham (Judiciary Committee) and Senator John Cornyn (SSCI) are requesting Attorney General Pam Bondi to appoint a special counsel to look into the Obama administration’s weaponization of the U.S. Intelligence Community to target Donald Trump with fabricated smears and false evidence using a fraudulent Russia connection.

This should be an immediate hard no for a few reasons. Number one, the special counsel process is where investigations go to die intentionally as a design of the legislative branch defense process. Second, the special counsel would not have cross-silo access to exfiltrate information unless it was accompanied by very specific Presidential authority. It just will not work.

[SOURCE]

The intelligence community information that exposes the plot will be found in very distinct ‘silos’, essentially the intelligence agencies that house the information. Additionally, inside each of the silos there is a formal and informal process to designate that information based on its internally defined national security value.

An example of silo retention can be found in the issue of the FBI housing information in “prohibited access” files. These files are not even discoverable by most internal search efforts.

Within the Sentinel system there are “Restricted Access” files that are used to control who can view the file information (sources and methods etc.). The FBI or investigative official (think authorized special counsel) can see the file but cannot access the information within it without a higher clearance level. In these files the Special Counsel can request access and then review. However, recently people discovered there are “Prohibited Access” files that makes the file invisible to both outside and inside searches or queries and are exclusively controlled by the FBI Director and FBI Deputy Director.

This is an example of a sub-silo (secret file keeping) within a distinct silo (FBI, Sentinel system). A special counsel would never discover the “prohibited” files, because there’s no way from outside the system to find it.

It’s a little complicated but DNI Tulsi Gabbard has been finding, declassifying and releasing these ‘prohibited access’ types of information, because as Director of National Intelligence -her clearance and position- allow her to gain full administrative level access to the entire metadata of IC information.

Tulsi can essentially log into all of the 18 intelligence agencies and review everything in the data storage system. A special counsel, regardless of authority, cannot do this. President Trump can demand full administrative access for himself and so can DNI Tulsi Gabbard. The rest of the silo administrators can only see the information inside their silo.

This limited access issue is how the intelligence agencies hide information. They rely on the inability of external reviewers to see the full scope and then cross reference to all other silos using the same terminology, data points and search sequences.

EXAMPLE – Making up an operational name like “Zero Footprint“, when DNI Tulsi Gabbard is looking at that operation, she can see the full scope of information related to Zero Footprint as the information goes from the White House (finding memo) to the CIA, to the State Dept, to the Pentagon, to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), possibly to the Joint Chiefs and then beyond to international partners (whole or part information shared). DNI Gabbard can see the entire continuum, cross reference each step in the process, see who handled the organization, communication, logistics, assignments and track each process, which enables her to map the inputs and outcomes along with the timeline. She can even see the briefings (or lack therein) to the Gang of Eight or PDB as they are recorded.

A special counsel has nowhere near this capacity.

In the example above, the research required to find, extract, cross-reference, organize and then assemble the totality of all information related to such a large intelligence operation (fyi, Zero Footprint was real), takes a lot of time and effort. Tulsi Gabbard is able to designate very specific aides to assist in this process, but the demand on her time is extreme even with help.

DNI Gabbard recently told Fox News (video below) she was/is using AI as a tool to do autonomous spider crawls through the various silos looking for information that pertained to specific points, phrases, times, dates and people within the 18-agency silo system. Hundreds of thousands of “return positive” files must then be sifted and reviewed for connection to the participants, and again timelines become the key. This is a big shift in the use of AI data search engine capability within the national security information space; however, it is exactly what I have been talking about for the past several years as I traveled back and forth to DC.

Now, keep in mind what I am describing above is “non-public” information. If you want to really understand the insanity of how the silos operate, you need to accept the same filing and hiding system exists even within public information. The congressional staff don’t even know what the other congressional staff are doing with information from within two different committees, like the Senate Judiciary Committee (FISC oversight) and the Senate Homeland Security Committee (DOJ-NSD), or Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (FBI – Cointel).

In essence, there is little to no information sharing within the silo process, even within the guys on the “same team,” and making matters worse sometimes a research team can gain information that is much more pertinent to the other guys looking at similar issues from within another silo. Discovering this is beyond frustrating; however, it does explain how independent researchers who share on open-source crowd sharing platforms can walk down a research trail much faster.

Bottom line, a Special Counsel is an exercise in futility, unless that special counsel has the same review and extraction capability as President Trump and/or DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

The best option is a team of investigators within Tulsi Gabbard’s office to continue the digging and connecting the information; then share the discoveries with DOJ officials. Previously, I said a small group within the National Security Council might also be able to deliver a similar outcome.

Lastly, a tip-line allowing the private sector crowdsourcing to push puzzle pieces toward the research team might also be a big help.

Gabbard reveals how she found evidence of Russiagate cover-up

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.