[teeman8r]

a free iran with freedom of religion can be possible with trump’s vision and bibi’s tenacity

check out these iranians for trump

https://rumble.com/v181401-january-6th-rally-2021.html

[albie]

Gotta love JD! Always a voice of reason!

[Jane Long]

Bravo, VP Vance!

[AnotherUnixGeek]

One thing about Tucker - he's perfectly consistent on not helping both Israel and Ukraine, and that's somewhat unique. Many of the people who have no problem helping Ukraine object to our aid to Israel, and vice versa. Tucker is opposed to our taking part in backing either of their militaries.

As far as Iran goes - I agree with Trump that the ayatollahs must never be allowed to have nukes. Their target would not just be the Little Satan they keep talking about (Israel) - sooner or later they'd target their Big Satan - the US.

If we can destroy Fordow with bunker-buster bombs and no US soldiers on the ground, I reluctantly would back Trump on this.

[nitzy]

I've yet to see a single good argument for why Iran was justified in violating its non-proliferation obligations. I've yet to see a single good pushback against the IAEA's findings.

There is only one country on the earth that was allowed to have nuclear weapons but WASN'T required to sign the non-proliferation treaty and has NEVER come under the scrutiny of the IAEA.

Would suggesting that they not be required to abide by it when their main enemy wasn't required to abide by it, be a reasonable excuse? I don't have an allegiance to either one but I would think that is at least a REASONABLE excuse (even if not convincing)

[teeman8r]

a free iran with freedom of religion can be possible with trump’s vision and bibi’s tenacity

check out these iranians for trump

https://rumble.com/v181401-january-6th-rally-2021.html

[steel_resolve]

He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president.

Funny i thought going to war involved congress. Hunh.

[rktman]

More:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4323620/posts

😊👍

[Georgia Girl 2]

Trump has earned our trust so trust him.

[Ozymandias Ghost]

The VP makes a solid, cogent argument in support of President Trump's position and I support the President and trust his and the VP’s judgment in this matter.

That said, there is no mention of Carlson, Bannon or Kirk in the VP’s post; all of whom have voiced some level of concern/disagreement w/the President's position regarding the U.S. level of involvement in the current ongoing war between Israel and Iran (and its surrogates).

I can only assume that the mention of Carlson, let alone singling him out in the headline, is part of the typical establishment tactics borrowed from Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” in order to focus and fix Carlson as a “bad actor.”

It would be helpful for those on both sides of important policy decisions to try to be open minded enough to listen to opposing points of view without feeling the need for personal attacks directed towards those with whom we disagree. Assuming these contrarian points of view are made in good faith, they only help to elucidate and refine our own viewpoints.

[Vaduz]

Tucker Carlson must be on something he’s lost his reasoning skills.