why are “accreditors” needed at all?
unneeded, self-important. and ideological accreditors are just imposing a monopoly from which they can skim profits and exert political control.
“I want to outlaw my competition.”
>>In such a “politicized,” “bifurcated accreditation system, … institutions aligned with traditional accreditors [would] maintain credibility while those accredited by new, politically driven agencies [would] face skepticism.”
Simple solution, stop recognizing the “traditional” Marxist accreditors. They have failed to do their job of basic quality assurance of universities.
Accepting Jesus as Lord, loving of country = radical beliefs.
Baby killing and child sexual mutilation = OK.
Who's the radical here?
if the DOE is actually shut down...and no one is there to accredit the accreditors....what then?