[Twotone]

This guy is accusing a lot of people of being conspiracy theorists. I wouldn’t put Dr. Robert Malone in that category, among others. But to have a show/debate worth listening to, the host has to understand what his guest will likely say & be prepared to challenge it. Rogan doesn’t appear to be taking his responsibility seriously.

[cbvanb]

There has been a lot of mainstream speculation that Epstein was an Israeli asset, or the front for an Israeli intelligence operation. The official story of his financial operation never made sense to me. I think he was fronting for some intelligence agency, and they all use sex for entrapment. Saying it was Israel doesn’t make someone an antisemite.

[DesertRhino]

It’s not the job of the host to “challenge” everything his guest might say. Especially in a long interview format. His giant audience also likes how it is.

It’s nice to see the orthodoxy shaken up. Carroll is very careful not to be anti-semitic. He repeatedly qualifies his statements that nothing he lays out should be taken as representing all Jewish people nor Judaism writ large.

But he lays out a very reasonable case that the Israeli government and our own beloved CIA were very much involved in the Epstein operation.

[ckilmer]

as far as I could tell, the main take away was that Epstein might have worked for Mossad. nothing definite of course.

this all just sounds like hype noise to get us talking.

[fr_freak]

But to have a show/debate worth listening to, the host has to understand what his guest will likely say & be prepared to challenge it.

Really? Because I don't think the host has any such responsibility. Would you think that it was Rogan's responsibility to challenge his guest if his guest were on the podcast talking about how horrible Nazi concentration camps were for Jews? I doubt it.