Posted on 04/07/2025 4:05:05 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Don’t get the “F” poster all jacked up. He/she/it might post you a link to listen to “soothing” music.
I am sick of these people saying this Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia POS didn’t get due process. He had plenty of “Due Process” back in 2019 which ruled against him and he got a lawyer to say he feared for his life if he got deported. He since ended up marrying and and having children to avoid deportation.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus means “Bring the body before the court”, for instance, if a person is detained or arrested or being held in custody and not provided any hearing in a reasonable amount of time (like some of the J6 people were), if the habeas petition is granted, that person gets a hearing in court. Habeas Corpus exists in our legal system because the King of England would routinely imprison Colonists with zero explanation, i.e. they would disappear. Habeas Corpus was adopted by the USA to ensure the US Govt. (or States) cannot repeat the acts of the king.
Did the J6 defendants get to have hearings based on this? On what basis would a habeus petition be denied?
Did this person file for asylum upon entering the first country where he could be safe?
No...he was here completely illegally. He only got a lawyer in 2019 after he was picked up, and that was when he applied for amnesty because he was afraid for his life if he was deported to El Salvador.
I have no personal knowledge of Habeas petitions being filed on behalf of the J6’ers, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Its kind of obvious that if it did happen , it was denied. A writ of habeas corpus may be denied for procedural issues such as untimeliness, successive petitions, or failure to exhaust administrative remedies, as well as for substantive deficiencies like lack of evidence or failure to allege fundamental constitutional violations.
How does this guy even have a case? If you come here illegally to escape danger in the country you’re from, you apply for asylum. If you don’t, then you came for some other reason.
Why was he not deported to any country but El Salvador in 2019?
I supposed because of judges. spit.
He doesn’t have a case. Which, thanks to the Trump Administration, means he is gone.
I went on Duck Duck Go to find out when the scumbag got married, but..I looked through ten pages, and all of them, every single return on every single page was “Administration admits to mistakenly deporting...”, “US court orders Donald Trump govt to bring back man deported to El Salvador” or “Trump DOJ says “administrative error” led to an innocent father being deported...”
It is a full court press. It has failed, he is in the El Salvador prison, and hopefully, he won’t be coming back.
They are absolutely doing the Trayvon Martin playbook. The pictures you see of him all over are of this cheery-faced, hardworking father of disabled children.
Search engines are mostly a waste of time at this point. All you can find is the mainstream narrative. Sometimes archive.org has stuff but finding it is the tough part.
Regarding the Tren de Aragua cases, I wonder whether the sources that Grok uses (to say that Venezuelan officials deny that any of the deported are in their organizational chart of TdA) mention that the US government doesn’t recognize the Maduro regime as the legitimate government of Venezuela, after actual printouts from precincts in their election showed that it was mathematically impossible for him to have genuinely won. I also wonder if any mention was made of Venezuelan officials warmly greeting the illegals who were deported back to Venezuela, or reported on any of the training sessions the Maduro govt provided for those who were going to invade the US.
Especially this one, which I hadn't considered:
"...I also wonder if any mention was made of Venezuelan officials warmly greeting the illegals who were deported back to Venezuela, or reported on any of the training sessions the Maduro govt provided for those who were going to invade the US..."
Please note that that is exactly why I added: (Boasberg) “and his cronies in the D.C. District and Court of Appeals.”
Would love to see a ruling on the bond requirement for any injunctive relief to really shrink the lawfare down to size.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.