Posted on 03/18/2025 2:11:43 PM PDT by DFG
They are trying to issue the most outrageous rulings possible to force Trump to ignore them. Since the Supreme Court seems unwilling to stop it, I don’t think he has any other choice than to ignore the rulings.
Likely? hey judge, nice research team ya got there. No case law, no decisions, just a 'likely'..
There are 94 Federal District Courts. This judge happened to be in the Maryland District. Not even discussing the Constitutionality of a Judge clearly interfering in a Presidential decision - why would a judge in Maryland District even think his court had jurisdiction?
What’s to stop a judge in the Montana Federal District Court from giving a ruling that the entirety of USAID is unconstitutional must be disbanded?
That didn’t take long.
This is ELEMENTARY constitutional law.
I understood this much about civics when I graduated from high school over fifty years ago.
He’s gonna weasel his way around the executive part by saying since congress mandated it, they “created” the department.
Judge Theodore D. Chuang needs to be impeached, convicted, removed from the bench, disbarred, indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced for giving aid and comfort to the domestic and foreign enemies of the United States.
“”which even seeks to reopen building access for dismissed USAID employees. “”
So....reopen the building, leave a case of beer and let them party for awhile. No paychecks, no jobs, nothing to do.
Ignore and carry on!
The fascinating statistical improbability of having yet another Democrat judge conduct a ruling against Trump and administration is really starting to make me think that there might be some judge shopping going on.
But then I remember that Judge shopping is illegal so that couldn’t be it, it’s just sheer coincidence that every single one of these cases appears to be in front of a Democrat appointed judge
They really want their unlimited flow of cash back ,they’ll try everything LOL
“Judge Theodore D. Chuang needs to be impeached, convicted, removed from the bench, disbarred, indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced for giving aid and comfort to the domestic and foreign enemies of the United States.”
You forgot to add “tarred and feathered”. Otherwise, you are on the right track.
“without the approval of a duly appointed USAID Officer”
I think the Secretary of State qualifies.
I remember being in the 7th grade and very confused as to why abortion was in the Federal purview...
Heard this on the radio. About made me slam on the brakes with incredulity.
...and remove all of the chairs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.