Posted on 03/03/2025 6:44:53 AM PST by davikkm
Why does every “step forward” seem to bring us even closer to an apocalyptic showdown with Russia? Now we are being told that the UK, France and other European nations will be working with Ukraine to develop a “plan to stop the fighting”. We aren’t being given specific details about the plan yet, but there are two things that we do know. First of all, it will involve European troops on Ukrainian soil. In fact, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is already telling us that the British are ready to put “boots on the ground”. Secondly, the plan will almost certainly require the Russians to give back large portions of territory that they have conquered. Of course the Russians have already clearly stated that they will never accept European troops on Ukrainian soil and that no territory that Russia is currently holding will be returned. In this case, the Russians have all the leverage because their troops are steadily moving forward. The bottom line is that the globalists know that there is zero chance that the Russians will agree to the peace plan that they are working on. So why put forward such a plan at all?
Ultimately, I think that European leaders want to convince their populations that they did “all that they could” before sending their own troops to die in eastern Ukraine.
They know that this “peace plan” is not going to work. They simply want to justify what they are about to do.
(Excerpt) Read more at citizenwatchreport.com ...
the globalist mindset...”ALL roads must lead to war”.
If Russia can’t beat Ukraine one on one, add in European troops and equipment It will only get more difficult for Russia. They can threaten Europe with nukes, but France and England also have nukes.
1) Zelenskyy was the one who staged this "set-up" and planned it well in advance. All along he has been unwilling to work with the Trump administration.
2) Zelenskyy wants one of two things, continued war with unlimited funding and weaponry OR a "security agreement" which is the equivalent of joining NATO - he wants NATO to defend Ukraine with boots on the ground i.e. no more proxy war but a direct confrontation of NATO and Russia - not gonna happen.
Sure. Theyve pre determined the outcome. They need to kill off enough to implement their one world globalist agenda.
Let them without us.
Europe seems to have forgotten. They have nearly NO RESOURCES to fight a protracted war.
Russia now has in place all the means to produce war materials. They’ve had three plus years to ramp up. Their troops now have the fighting experience for that region.
What does Europa have? NOTHING!
Your on your own Europe. Have at it
The Europeans are terrified of war. We’re more likely to see them back down than go into war. Just as a side note, one thing you need for war is large cadre of teenagers. There are very few in Europe. Also, Europe bought into the “Peace Dividend” in a big way. They have some shiny, new high-tech hardware but darned little of the expendables like ammo and artillery shells. Last I looked Germany’s entire sub fleet was down for repairs.
“The insidious bastards that wrote that stuff about individuality for the Saturday Evening Post, don’t know anything more about real battle than they do about fornicating.”
Patton
Russia has been fighting NATO for the last 3 years - not merely "Ukraine."
It's been NATO armor, vehicles, intelligence, missiles, ammunition, spec ops, training/tactics, and money on the battlefields of Donbas. The notion Russia is struggling to fight sad "Ukraine" is more propaganda designed to turn zeepers brains to mush.
Russia has merely been planning and waiting for the entry of "troops."
If Europe wants to finalize its suicide, started in 1914, in the form of a 3rd continental war, Russia is ready for them.
There’s the thought that this whole situation is leading up to a unified coalition of European nations setting up a scenario to fulfill end times prophecies.
Russia has more men, money, resources than the Ukraine by far. In addition, they have the greatest nuclear arsenal on earth.
Brit and EU troops in Ukraine would be are less than worthless - IMHO. Absent U.S. putting boots on the ground in Ukraine OR .... Britain and/or France an/or U.S. using tactical nukes in Ukraine ....Russian will take Ukraine through attrition.
Am I missing something?
There have been stories and at least one video of Russian soldiers castrating Ukrainian POWs with pocket knives. Did the UK, et al, prepare their “boots on the ground” for that possibility if they’re captured?
“Ultimately, I think that European leaders want to convince their populations that they did “all that they could” before sending their own troops to die in eastern Ukraine.”
AND of course, “Orangeman bad “His quest for peace led us to war!!! REEEEEEEE!!!!”
Do the EU clowns think they actually have a fighting army? Last I saw they ha soldiers marching in high heels and dresses. They have allowed millions of violent muslims to conquer their lands. Maybe there are still some tough soldiers in former east bloc countries. but France, Germany, Austria? Not a chance.
Deterrance.
Poland has an army that's probably strong enough to seize Moscow. But that will never happen because of nukes.
Moscow and St. Petersburg are quite vulnerable because they are located right on the Great European Plain and there are no natural defenses protecting the cities from an invasion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.