Posted on 11/16/2024 2:19:48 PM PST by hardspunned
So far, President Trump’s choices to fill vacancies in his administration have been stellar. Unfortunately, President Trump learned the hard way what happens when trust and loyalty are not at the top of the list of qualifications for candidates he chooses to interact with him and members of his cabinet regularly.
Today marks the first day that Trump supporters find themselves scratching their heads over the potential selection of former US Rep. and FBI Special Agent Mike Rogers, who recently ran for US Senate in Michigan as a Republican, as the potential FBI Director.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I’ll take a chance on Vance. RFK I’m already sure about. Trump needs to dump him ASAP before he finds out the hard way. Although it’s probably already too late, he’s going to cause problems for sure.
Globalist? Sessions? You’re a loon.
Loyal? He’s been around the Trump operation for what, 6 months?
Qualified? I guess time will tell, but he’s a leftist, and I don’t trust leftists.
Kick to the curb? No, he could have just kept him in the advisory role he currently has. No need to put him in charge of HHS. I’d prefer a strong Conservative type in that chair.
I hope he does well, don’t get me wrong, but I wouldn’t have put him in the Cabinet, anywhere. We’ll see.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THAT EXPLANATION...I WAS GOING COOCOO TRYING TO SORT IT OUT.
REGARDS
You can distrust RFK if you want - I don’t blame you - almost all politicians do not deserve any trust.
But I see some sincerity there.. I’m betting he’s telling the truth when he says the Democrat Party has become the party of war-mongering and corporate corruption.
Trump is going to let him fight corruption in the food and drug industry - and give him a platform to talk truth about it without being censored or cancelled.
“...I’m betting he’s telling the truth when he says the Democrat Party has become the party of war-mongering and corporate corruption. ...”
That didn’t take a deep well of insight to draw that conclusion.
“....But I see some sincerity there.. ....”
Was he sincere in the statements he made - see post 30?
Or he is sincere now because he says something agreeable to us?
I still think its going to be Kash Patel.
Gaetz called Sessions a Stockholm syndrome victim of deep state.
But, I suppose you don’t like Gaetz.
What deep state Rino do you want for FBI and AG? Another back stabber for the never Trumpers?
Do we know which Mike Rogers Paul was referring to? There are three!
If you weren’t acting so willfully belligerent, you’d’ve noticed I already said Sessions was the wrong person for the job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.