Posted on 10/30/2024 1:02:47 PM PDT by Enterprise
This article was about a preventative, not a cure. Vaccines work by training the immune system prior to exposure to the disease. Once you are exposed to Covid, there are no cures, just treatments.
And in no case, ever, has any vaccine been more dangerous than the disease it protects against.
exDemMom : "And in no case, ever, has any vaccine been more dangerous than the disease it protects against."..
"This article was about a preventative, not a cure. " Vaccines work by training the immune system prior to exposure to the disease."
Please see the less than 17 minute video below which explains the rapid rise of "Turbo Cancers", especially colorectal cancers:
"Turbo Cancers Are Rapidly Forming, Spreading and Mutating " - Dr. John Campbell (UK)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AHJc8D-7Vg
Please note and check the comments below the video (over 3,200 comments after only 5 hrs of release)
Then why was 'SV 40' found in some of the covid 19 vaccines, since simian virus enhances the possibility of various cancers ?
Hey LOOK!
Dingbat's back!!
That last statement is of course "disinformation."
Because lots of times, people get exposed to COVID and *nothing* happens.
And in no case, ever, has any vaccine been more dangerous than the disease it protects against.
STrictly speaking, this is likely to be true: but only because the clot shots are not vaccines, but bioweapons.
Oh, fer crying out loud.
Covid is not The Black Death or rabies.
It's a cold virus that most people survived just fine, and the ones that succumbed were those who didn't get any treatment until they were at death's door.
In 2020 protocol was to send people home and tell them to not seek out medical treatment unless they couldn't breathe or their lips were turning blue.
At that point, so much damage was done that by the time they went to the hospital, it is likely to have been too late.
Not to mention the medical *treatment* of venting them and injecting them with Remdesivir poison.
More people died from medical malpractice than the disease itself.
Additionally, it was known that the comorbidities were obesity and diabetes and do you think the government and medical community would have told people to lose weight and exercise?
Nooooo, couldn't have anything that common sense. That would have been too easy. There's no money to be made in people not being hospitalized with Covid.
Nope, better to force them into an indoor sedentary lifestyle that exacerbates both those conditions and then get the money for venting them and other protocol the government rewarded hospitals money for.
Whether Covid was initially as bad as the videos coming from China suggested or whether that was psyops, the fact of the matter is, it isn't that deadly if treated well, as in Uttar Pradesh, and the Diamond Princess Cruise ship showed.
The medical community absolutely nuked its own credibility and deservedly so. They brought this all on themselves.
And where are the long term (ten year) studies showing us the *vaccine* safety and efficacy?
Still waiting for those to come out.
Another 6 years ought to be about right.
The Diamond Princess showed that people had immunity from SARS Covid 1 IIRC.
But that little factoid keeps getting ignored and buried by those who are making a killing off the so-called *vaccines*.
The long term effects of having immunity against infectious diseases are actually very well studied. The field of immunology exists for this reason.
Furthermore, the long term effects of having antibodies against Covid are exactly the same whether you get those antibodies the safe way through vaccination or the dangerous way through catching Covid.
Where are the long term studies on the safety and efficacy of the new, experimental, mRNA Covid “vaccine”? You know, the ones that are supposed to be done to ensure the safety of it.
But I suspect you knew what I meant.
Matter of fact, I’m sure you knew what I meant because I was very specific about the question and in no way was it a question about the field of immunology.
We have hundreds of years of data on long-term effects of becoming immune to infectious disease.
I know that you're trying to imply that the vaccine itself is somehow inadequately tested. But, given the fact that vaccines do not have long-term effects other than the B-cell, T-cell, and antibody response of the immune system, there is nothing to study long-term other than the immunology.
The components of the vaccine are completely natural and indistinguishable from those components as they exist in the intact virus. So, if you are concerned about being exposed to virus mRNA or spike protein, it really does not make a difference whether the exposure is in the context of an infection or an immunization. Except that during an infection, you are exposed to many more virus mRNA species and many more virus proteins than you are from a vaccine (29 vs. 1). Are you afraid of long-term consequences from being exposed to all 29 virus mRNAs and proteins? If not, then why are you concerned about being exposed to just one viral mRNA and protein? None of these virus mRNAs and proteins stick around for long. In the case of vaccination, they're all gone within a few days. In the case of active disease, they may take a few months to all disappear. But in no case do they stick around for prolonged periods of time.
Stop allowing antivax fear-mongers to manipulate you. They don't have your best interest at heart.
I give you Cutter labs and polio.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.