To: know.your.why
Kind of like a Tic Tac craft? Funny how that happens.
2 posted on
10/18/2024 6:59:11 PM PDT by
Vermont Lt
(Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
To: know.your.why
Elon Musk, pick up the white courtesy phone, call for Elon Musk...
3 posted on
10/18/2024 7:17:00 PM PDT by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
To: know.your.why
I’m thinking this will cost way, and I mean way more than just $35 million.
4 posted on
10/18/2024 8:01:41 PM PDT by
Licensed-To-Carry
(John 14:6 Romans 10:9 Hebrews 9:27)
To: know.your.why
“I used to know a girl like that.”
LOL...but I’d wager there are a lot more guys like that.
5 posted on
10/18/2024 8:15:20 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(It should be illegal to be here illegally. It should be a crime to be committing crimes in the USA.)
To: know.your.why
Ummmm - how can $35 Million make a dent in that project?
Such aircraft will cost many multiples of that...and R&D is way more expensive than eventual product...
Someone’s just found a way to dip into taxpayers’ money...
9 posted on
10/19/2024 5:00:37 AM PDT by
trebb
(So many fools - so little time...)
To: know.your.why
I can see a cobimination of chemical fueled booster rockets, for the heavy lifting and very small nuclear fueled propulsion units for the very long distance requirements. The nuclear fueled units would be so capable that in the near emptiness of space they could carry the heavier chemical fueled boosters for off planet take-offs and landings.
10 posted on
10/19/2024 9:15:22 AM PDT by
Wuli
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson