>The real fact is that women aren’t in addition to the existing military but are a one for one replacement of a man, when you see a female GI, know that she is taking the place of a man that should be in uniform.
Hello strawman argument. The article isn’t about support personnel. The article is about downgrading the qualifications for and the training of front-line troops, even elite units, to fit the DEI agenda.
Discussion of whether a supply unit needs more maleness is some other thread.
That made zero sense, it was total nonsense unless you meant to post to someone else about support.
Since you brought it up, women don’t belong in support either.