>with the two videos he argues for one shooter from the woods
He bases this on two guys getting shot, the puff of the bullet hitting the handrail and I think also a purse. That was what I got out of one of his earlier videos.
One of the guys that was allegedly shot was the same guy that allegedly slipped as reported by another observer. The problem I have with it is that he cuts the video clip just as the guy falls but we don’t see what happens afterwards - was he shot or did he get up?
“was he shot or did he get up?”
He eventually did walk away since there is no evidence he was put into an ambulance.
That does not mean that a shot totally missed him.
Cullen is still collecting cell phone evidence to trace all the shots fired that day.
There were a lot of them—could be over twenty when all sub-audible shots are identified.
So—this may be a very minor footnote as more evidence comes in....
My early read is that the intent was to spook the crowd with a mass casualty event.
One reason it failed was the wind was 10-12 miles an hour and all the sub-sonic shots went all over the place.
We have a lot more to learn—this seems to follow the old rule that the more you know the more you realize you do not know.