The scenario is to wait for better data.
Or show me the math that supports ANY of it based upon the videos posted here.
OR here’s a better scenario: Dumbass Crooks was supposed to have been a better shot and all this extra ‘noise’ is intentional to mask the truth. Grassy Knoll all over again.
i.e., never any answers.
DJT is a very lucky man. Perhaps even chosen.
Perhaps both.
The chance of getting any “real” data from these politicized agencies is about 0. But we might get 51 former USSS agents to sign a letter saying it was the Russians…BTW
The second audio analysis did use one microphone and there were different times between sonic crack and reports. That would indicate different distances, those distances cannot be fully calculated because bullet velocities are not known. What I will say is that the longer times between crack and report mean that there are at least some difference in distance unless one was using a 45/70(i know subsonic lol) but to me it raises questions
Here is a scenario, the patsy fired earlier than he was supposed to causing Trump to duck down before other shots could be made
Did you see the video of SS hosing off roof, ever seen a crime scene cleaned up by officials that quickly
Maybe the authorities were that inept and allowed this person to evade detection and climb up on an obvious shooting spot, and Trump was luckier and turned his head at just the right moment and had the composure to understand what was happening and duck quickly
Could be that simple, doubt it , what I have no doubt is all these groups are in the very least in CYA mode and the only “facts” we are going to get are from what people can gleen from open source