Don’t necessarily disagree, sometimes the answer is the simplest, but disregarding outright isn’t a good look either.
You have no more knowledge as what happened as I do, but your certainty of events is not something I share
The only thing I’m certain of is that if there were multiple shooters, he was dead when he arrived (kill zone).
I neglected to address this. Yes, 'Occam's Razor' certainly applies. Think hard about that one.
And I've disregarding nothing outright. Facts matter.
Or all we're doing is a bunch of 'Faucisms'...and that speaks volumes.
Please don't assert to me that a government conspiracy to take out the frontrunner in a presidential campaign was organized by a crew of rank amateurs...unless therein lies the plot (a rogue element). Still, the combination of lousy shooters, ignorance of post-assassination audio analysis - which would assuredly point to a conspiracy and finger the administration itself - and ignorance of post-assassination ballistic analysis - none of which has been presented as yet - requires one to become a pretzel in suspending disbelief to give any serious merit to the highly subjective speculative analysis presented thus far.
If I was doing such analysis - and I have - my video would have been much more carefully worded.
If I happen to be right - no assurances, certainly - I want these eggheads crafting such videos to literally have egg on their faces in the absence of some serious mea culpa.
And if I'm in left field, I will certainly concede, because it is certainly a possibility: Stupid conspirators, perhaps with intent. If there wasn't the momentary head shift, one could argue that the ear shot was intentional. But I'm not going down that bunny hole...