Audio Analysis Is 100% Clear: Trump & Crowd Were Shot At By Two Separate People - 32 min

rumble ^ | Peak Prosperity

[logi_cal869]

The only thing I’m certain of is that if there were multiple shooters, he was dead when he arrived (kill zone).

[blitz128]

Let’s beat a dead horse
What is your opinion on this?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NaW8MzocIuE

[blitz128]

More of hannity’s “good people”?

[Texas Fossil]

Hannity is not one of the “good people”

And I doubt he would know a “good person” if he saw one.

Same is true of most of FOX.

There was a time they were better.

There was a time when regional newspapers had Good Staff.

There was a time when regional newspapers were owned by individuals who knew what Truth meant.

That was long long ago in another time.

[logi_cal869]

I browsed it. I have not seen the video of the shadow on the water tower. I looked at the audio analysis as well (the ‘6th shot’).

So, then...Ok. Let’s look at that. Shooter on the WT.

DJT would be dead. Guaranteed, based upon what looks like a clear line of sight.

But if the shooter missed, where are the other victims?

And if there was AT LEAST THREE shooters, as that audio analysis appears to suggest, are you to assert that, while assuredly Crooks was a lousy shot (if he knew windage, this discussion would be quite different), now the assertion is that we have a conspiracy to assassinate DJT with MULTIPLE lousy shooters?

C’mon, man. IMHO the likelihood is that the counter sniper(s) fired multiple shots from multiple positions to take out Crooks and that the audio analysis has some major faults. Ironically, this is the first guy to analyze that aspect (counter fire).

Do the math: Show me in black & white how the numbers qualify. SHOW ME. These video armchair jockeys do their supposition well (”almost,” “ballpark,”, “rough guess,” “roughly,” “assumption,”) but NO MATH. It’s bunch of confirmation bias. That’s not scientific: That’s utter speculation. Based upon figures presented here at FR by such videos, the ‘ear shot’ could not have come from Crooks. I’ve done the math. Additionally, the math does not support the WT shooter.

None of it adds up, for a single shooter, or for multiple shooters. That’s a major problem. Prove me wrong and show me the math. These jockeys in the videos certainly don’t show their work (just more “almost,” “ballpark,”, “rough guess,” “roughly,” “assumption”).

And if USSS didn’t have a spotter on the WT - i.e., the shadow - Cheatle should definitely be wearing an orange jumpsuit.

[logi_cal869]

...sometimes the answer is the simplest, but disregarding outright isn’t a good look either.

I neglected to address this. Yes, 'Occam's Razor' certainly applies. Think hard about that one.

And I've disregarding nothing outright. Facts matter.

Or all we're doing is a bunch of 'Faucisms'...and that speaks volumes.

Please don't assert to me that a government conspiracy to take out the frontrunner in a presidential campaign was organized by a crew of rank amateurs...unless therein lies the plot (a rogue element). Still, the combination of lousy shooters, ignorance of post-assassination audio analysis - which would assuredly point to a conspiracy and finger the administration itself - and ignorance of post-assassination ballistic analysis - none of which has been presented as yet - requires one to become a pretzel in suspending disbelief to give any serious merit to the highly subjective speculative analysis presented thus far.

If I was doing such analysis - and I have - my video would have been much more carefully worded.

If I happen to be right - no assurances, certainly - I want these eggheads crafting such videos to literally have egg on their faces in the absence of some serious mea culpa.

And if I'm in left field, I will certainly concede, because it is certainly a possibility: Stupid conspirators, perhaps with intent. If there wasn't the momentary head shift, one could argue that the ear shot was intentional. But I'm not going down that bunny hole...

[blitz128]

If it doesn’t add up for single or multiple shooters then what is your scenario that works

[logi_cal869]

The scenario is to wait for better data.

Or show me the math that supports ANY of it based upon the videos posted here.

OR here’s a better scenario: Dumbass Crooks was supposed to have been a better shot and all this extra ‘noise’ is intentional to mask the truth. Grassy Knoll all over again.

i.e., never any answers.

DJT is a very lucky man. Perhaps even chosen.

Perhaps both.

[blitz128]

The chance of getting any “real” data from these politicized agencies is about 0. But we might get 51 former USSS agents to sign a letter saying it was the Russians…BTW
The second audio analysis did use one microphone and there were different times between sonic crack and reports. That would indicate different distances, those distances cannot be fully calculated because bullet velocities are not known. What I will say is that the longer times between crack and report mean that there are at least some difference in distance unless one was using a 45/70(i know subsonic lol) but to me it raises questions

Here is a scenario, the patsy fired earlier than he was supposed to causing Trump to duck down before other shots could be made

Did you see the video of SS hosing off roof, ever seen a crime scene cleaned up by officials that quickly

Maybe the authorities were that inept and allowed this person to evade detection and climb up on an obvious shooting spot, and Trump was luckier and turned his head at just the right moment and had the composure to understand what was happening and duck quickly

Could be that simple, doubt it , what I have no doubt is all these groups are in the very least in CYA mode and the only “facts” we are going to get are from what people can gleen from open source

[Bob Ireland]

***This is probably the most in depth analysis l’ve seen of what Crooks was able to pull off at the Trump Rally in Butler, PA.
Post Reply | Private Reply***

Sorry, bitt... I have been in hospital for two days; second time in a week, third time in a month - vertigo. And of course it has become a fight on my part to find out the cause. Now I have lots to catch up with. sigh

Thanks for all the pings! It helps me keep up better at a glance. :^)

[2CAVTrooper]

“If they are higher pitched, what would cause that?”

Different caliber gun, distance and angle in relationship to the location of the microphone, echo, etc.