Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

As I stated, when the states at independence kept the Common Law, the word subject was transformed to citizen. Vattel is foreign law, not the Common Law.


69 posted on 07/15/2024 2:14:41 PM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: GreenLanternCorps
As I stated, when the states at independence kept the Common Law, the word subject was transformed to citizen.

As Reagan said: "The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they are ignorant... it's that they know so much which isn't so."

We tossed out Subject law. It was incompatible with a Republican form of Government. Laws declaring ownership over a child the minute it is born are contrary to natural law. They are monarchy law, and they suit the needs of a monarchy. They make servants of anyone born under their roof or on their land.

We kept the routine and usual parts of English common law. We tossed out everything that was incompatible with natural law, i.e. American law. We tossed out "Corruption of Blood." We tossed out taxes going to the Church of England. We tossed out Debtor's prison, and we tossed out subjectude and replaced it with citizenship.

The founders *DID NOT* transform "subject" into "citizen." They explicitly chose "citizen" to replace "subject", and they meant to sever all ties with monarchist law.

72 posted on 07/15/2024 3:18:36 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson