Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TalBlack
The reason that wouldn't make sense is that ultimate responsibility for the security of the former president rests with the Secret Service. And this building was line-of-sight and within 120-150 yards (i.e., an easy shot).

Secret Service might have utilized local/state snipers to cover that building, but even then the responsibility to pick the most reliable local/state snipers and coordinate them with the overall plan still rests with the Secret Service.

93 posted on 07/15/2024 2:46:53 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (It's funny that the harder I work, the luckier I get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: RoosterRedux

“the responsibility to pick the most reliable local/state snipers and coordinate them with the overall plan still rests with the Secret Service.”

Absolutely right. The notion of split duties split between local police and SS and are uncoordinated is laughable. The idea that a rooftop that close to the president is not secured is laughable. The notion that the SS only has body-coverage responsibility and not overall command is ridiculous.


108 posted on 07/15/2024 5:55:54 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“When exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward Snowden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson