Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Macho MAGA Man

This headline makes it seem she is saying he will be taken in to custody Friday.

I doubt that’s what she is saying.


4 posted on 06/26/2024 10:35:11 AM PDT by ifinnegan (MDemocrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan
She has said for about a week now that she is going to force a vote on something called "inherent contempt". Article from The Hill:
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4736798-anna-paulina-luna-detain-garland/ (sorry, no time to format the link! Gotta run!)
7 posted on 06/26/2024 10:40:08 AM PDT by glennaro (2024: The Year of The Reckoning, lest our Republic succumb to the "progressive" disease of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
This headline makes it seem she is saying he will be taken in to custody Friday. I doubt that’s what she is saying.

She didn't. The headline is Gateway Pundit being what it is -- Clickbait Pundit.

What she actually said is "we will press forward with calling the privilege motion on Inherent Contempt to the floor on Friday morning" and if the motion is passed, that would "enable the Speaker of the House to order the Sergeant of Arms to take into custody the attorney general if he fails to comply with our request.”

In other words, there is no guarantee that a motion for Inherent Contempt" will be made in the House on Friday, that the House will approve the motion, or even if it does, that the Speaker will order the Sergeant of Arms to arrest Garland.

32 posted on 06/26/2024 12:58:02 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson