It will be completely trashed within six months of occupation.
No question.
I agree that that has been the case in the past and likely case here as well. Is there no possible way to manage this property that results in it staying nice or are the residents by definition too feral, mentally ill, drug addled, sociopathic to have any other result? I know this sounds like the saps who say communism never works because the right people aren’t running it the right way but COULD such a property be managed so that the destructive homeless are chased back out to living under bridges and overpass and those who stay live responsibly? Could a tough love approach teach lasting lessons in behavior here?
“trashed within six months of occupation”
Sometimes it takes a couple of years for the rot to get fully out of control.
Almost every slum building was beautiful and new for a while.