Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Golden Eagle; Dr. Franklin
Where is this proof in Arizona you are talking about documented? It’s easy to throw numbers around, but how many of the “200,000 fake registered voters” have actually been named, and where is the list of fake names?

If I go to the trouble of finding this information for you, will you change your opinion on the matter?

The 75,000 (really 74,000 and some change) came from the Cyber Ninja audit of Maricopa county. So too did the 95% for Joe Biden overseas ballots.

I don't recall if the 200,000 came from the cyber ninjas, or another party, but I do recall reading it and regarding it as a credible source at the time.

There are certain freepers that keep up with this evidence, but I am not one of them. I used to keep links for the various issues that I discuss, but it became unwieldy and so I stopped doing it.

Dr Franklin comes to mind as someone who might be able to put his finger precisely on the source of these three items. If not, I can find them again I think.

108 posted on 06/17/2024 8:04:26 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
If I go to the trouble of finding this information for you, will you change your opinion on the matter?

My opinion is that Arizona was likely stolen. But the attempts trying to prove that have been very sloppy, and whatever information that supposedly proves is still hidden somewhere, if it even exists. See, even you can't produce the 200,000 names you insisted were "fake voters."

Arizona alone didn't tip the election, either. It took several states. There were some obvious shenanigans going on in those states too. But nothing that has happened even after all these years has proven anything convincingly. No one really even tried. It's been all about building a PR campaign on social media to convince people it happened, verses actually proving it happened.

And as I keep saying, without hard evidence that can stand up cross-examination in court, our bedrock principles are, innocent until proven guilty, and you have to follow the Constitution, which was for the Congress to certify the electors sent by the States. Doesn't mean I'm happy about it. I just put our highest principles and ethics above emotion. And whining is for losers, at least where I come from. You try to prevent it from happening again, but that takes actual work, starting with proving what went wrong last time, which is still mostly abstract.

111 posted on 06/17/2024 8:37:51 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Principles, not partisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp; Golden Eagle
"The lawsuit claims 14/15 counties in Arizona have "implausibly high" voter registration levels and calls on Fontes to "develop and implement additional reasonable and effective registration list-maintenance programs." It also claims that there are more registered voters than there are residents in the state. "Because the secretary does not maintain accurate voter rolls, ineligible voters have an opportunity to vote in Arizona elections, risking the dilution of plaintiffs' legitimate votes,'' the lawsuit states, according to local press.
Attorney Andrew Gould told local media: "Based on even the most conservative data sources, Arizona has at least 500,000 registered voters on the voter rolls who should have otherwise been removed," he said."

GOP Head Wants 500,000 Voters Removed From Register
128 posted on 06/17/2024 3:08:27 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson