Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk

History cannot be judged in the rear view mirror.


20 posted on 06/08/2024 2:07:06 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$

No it cannot and should not be. Doing that judgement btw has a term applied to it among historians of any professional ethical level.

It is called: PRESENTISM. Presentism. Applying mores or judgements of the present day to years ago in history.

Wonder if these lib weirdos would “judge” the horrific human sacrifices to various gods in Toltec Pre-Columbian days. Horrific mass sacrifice of their enemy tribes.


52 posted on 06/08/2024 3:19:18 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: mad_as_he$$

“History cannot be judged in the rear view mirror.”

Unless you are a retarded wokester prog who applies their simpering modern mores to the past. They do that intentionally to erase the past because the Party has commanded: “Who controls the past controls the future: Who controls the present controls the past.”


56 posted on 06/08/2024 3:24:56 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“When exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward Snowden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson