Posted on 05/07/2024 6:01:48 PM PDT by Enlightened1
total nonsense ... the actual quote from gates is:
“There’s a lot of lipid nanoparticles, and some are very self-assembling.”
so, the tiny fat bubbles that enclose the mRNA self-assemble, which pretty much means if they bump into each other they merge, just like what happens with any other fat particles that haven’t been homogenized ...
Dodged another bullet!
https://twitter.com/COVIDSelect?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Iām going to keep sharing this bc itās highly censored.
Thanks ā¦@ted_macieā© pic.twitter.com/LpY0JUcphyā Kelly DNPšFunctional/Integrative Med (@kacdnp91) May 7, 2024
BREAKING.šØ
Two *REDACTED* State Dept. cables provide further evidence of the U.S. government's COVER-UP of the Wuhan lab leak of the Covid-19 virus.
"NEW State Department documents reviewed by @COVIDSelect suggest COVID-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China and the CCP coveredā¦ pic.twitter.com/bMatSCqgxeā Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) May 8, 2024
HUH?
The fear of the lipid nanotechnology used to encapsulate the messinger RNA with nanoparticles is being incited by those wishing to exploit that fear for their own benefit. The lipid nanoparticles is a just a safe structure of fatty acids no more dangerous than fats from eating a beef steak.
“Lipid Nanoparticles for mRNA Delivery”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353930/
Your comment is worthy of saving.
I provide a link in my post #25 that gives the scientific understanding of lipid nanotechnology, titled “Lipid Nanoparticles for mRNA Deliveryā
I hope they find him half eaten by wolves.
Nano technology network hardware. Do you understand that?
They are not safe at all. The inventor Dr Malone has said that. Heās been
Involved with it the entire time and he is saying itās not safe.
They are still testing on it, and even Bill Gates admits that in the video if you would have watched it.
They are changing your DNA and putting experimental networking technology into your body.
How are you still lost on this subject?
Why would they say , āself assemblyā.
Oh you think they are just talking about bumping into each other
LOL!
Keep lying to yourself and living in denial of reality.
Enjoy your fantasy land.
It says self assembly in the patent.
What is it assembling?
The problem is you have been brainwashed by your TV.
You have not taken the time to see how nanotechnology and 5g are a real thing that DARPA has been working on since 2005.
Read up on nanotechnology and what it does. It communicates with 5g.
There are plenty of people in the field talking about it, but they donāt show it to you on TV. Therefore, you donāt think it does not exist.
“New vaccines seem to be a way to reduce global population.”
Capt. Obvioius, is that you?
Had to get the Moderna shot for work, so far I’m ok, and I thank God every day that I don’t stroke out, or otherwise keel over. I didn’t want this. I didn’t want to be out in the position to make the choice. If there is any justice, thos responsible will be held to account in this life or the next.
You said:
“Nano technology network hardware. Do you understand that?
They are not safe at all. The inventor Dr Malone has said that. Heās been involved with it the entire time and he is saying itās not safe.”
From this source:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/03/technology/robert-malone-covid.html
“Dr. Malone also routinely sells himself on the shows as the inventor of mRNA vaccines, the technology used by Pfizer and Moderna for their Covid-19 shots, and says he doesnāt get the credit he deserves for their development. While he was involved in some early research into the technology, his role in its creation was minimal at best, say half a dozen Covid experts and researchers, including three who worked closely with Dr. Malone.”
Please read the entire article and get a more balanced approach to your opinion.
Already starting.
Yeah that is the NY Times... They are full of crap.
You are quoting from the same paper that said Trump is a Putin puppet.
You did see this right?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4236367/posts?page=1
Don’t think it will just be AstraZeneca....
If you read the "New York Times" article, the AstraZeneca vaccine uses a different technology. I gave that article link for your information as useful background for you. You act as if I hit you with a water balloon.
You’re welcome.
Oh, you saw a video and therefore it's true.
Anyone can show anything in a video. Did you fact-check the video at all by going to the manufacturer or FDA website and looking up the product insert for yourself?
Some product inserts do not fill up all the space on the paper. When this happens, they have a statement that says "This page intentionally left blank." I bet that's what the video was showing you.
PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE (published December, 2022).
Covid-19 Vaccine Pfizer Prescribing Information published in December, 2020 and updated January, 2023.
The FDA has very strict requirements for what must be included on a package insert and on the package itself. All the way at the bottom of the second link, it shows what the vaccine packages and vial labels must look like.
I recognize that videos such as the one you describe are supposed to make people believe that drug companies are pulling the wool over people's eyes. Those who make such videos have a very specific audience in mind: they are targeting people who have no understanding whatsoever of biology, immunology, or pharmacology and who don't know how to fact-check.
In reality, trying to get something past the FDA is harder than trying to pull a fast one on the IRS. Remember Reagan's saying, "We're from the government and we're here to help you"? To the government, a pharmaceutical company and an individual citizen are the same. Neither one is going to get away with trying to fool the government. It's actually harder for a pharmaceutical company since the government (through the FDA) is watching everything they do.
FDA to pharmaceutical companies: "Every breath you take, every move you make, I'll be watching you"--Sting.
m(odified)rna is not a scientific term. mRNA, scientifically, is an abbreviation for "messenger RiboNucleicAcid."
The notion that any scientist would use "mRNA" to refer to modified RNA is completely false. We don't say that.
RNA has a lot of different functions and has a lot of names depending on the function. Messenger RNA (mRNA) very specifically refers to an RNA which carries a copy of a gene to the ribosome in order to make the protein encoded in that gene. Other types of RNA include siRNA, snRNA, mtRNA, tRNA, rRNA, etc. Any kind of RNA can be and is modified through natural processes. Thus, the term "m(odified)rna" is not only not a scientific term, it is actually meaningless. The vaccine mRNA is modified to increase its stability using completely natural enzymes. Without those completely natural modifications, it would not last long enough after injection to even reach cells. The immune system destroys RNA pretty rapidly.
Thank you for the link. The memories it brings back of the time I spent in the lab just optimizing experimental conditions so that I could finally test the hypothesis I really wanted to test!
While reading it, I came to a realization.
Antivaxxers love to scare people by telling them that the mRNA vaccines are unnatural and will stay in the body forever.
What occurs to me is that if we could come up with an mRNA vaccine that stayed in the body forever, the immunity induced by that vaccine would never wane. So, ironically, if vaccines had the attributes that antivaxxers claim they do, vaccines would actually be “true” vaccines according to antivaxxer false definition of vaccine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.