[Rockingham]

In the real world, evidence is assessed and judgments made, with hypothetical possibilities built on mere imagination and supposition rejected for lack of evidence. I know how it is done, having been in more than a few courtrooms and assessed and argued legal and factual issues from death penalty cases to small claims.

As for the attack on Moscow, the evidence of ISIS involvement is already persuasive: ISIS claimed the attack as theirs and provided video that was shot on the scene by the attackers as proof. In addition, as reported by Russian authorities, the attackers used passports from Tajikistan and at least some were Tajiks. There is no valid basis for thinking that Ukraine was involved.

For generations, Tajikistan and other Muslim states to the south of Russia have been a security concern. As for pointing fingers at the CIA, US influence and credibility in that region collapsed after the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.

[EEGator]

You are simply incorrect on all levels.

Your experience has zero effect on truth and logic.