Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Auslander154

“I can’t believe that the Supreme Court is not aware of this “jury of their peers” injustice.”

They are, and from what I understand have even ruled to allow prosecution without a “true” jury of our peers.


3 posted on 03/16/2024 10:03:46 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind

Then it is unfixable if the Supreme Court is not concerned with ‘a jury of our peers.”

I can see the day coming when the juries will consist of A.I bots.
6 Google bots and 6 Musk bots.
Then no one will ever be convicted. All hung juries.
At least our guys would stand a better chance than how it is now.
I feel so bad for Peter Navarro for taking a righteous and principled stand.

What if the defendant can choose where he wants to be tried or at least from his home state ?
The feds can pay for transportation costs of its witnesses.

Should also be easier to charge prosecutors for withholding testimony and other “odors of malfeasance.”

Thanks to all for your input on this matter.


16 posted on 03/16/2024 1:51:00 PM PDT by Auslander154 ("Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson