Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

I dearly hope that Judge Cannon has the courage to dismiss this nonsense. Thankfully the Hur report can be used by Cannon. The report documents the reckless ways Biden, without properly being cleared, took highly classified documents and stored them in several different locations where unauthorized people could have viewed them (and probably did!) And despite that, there have been no charges against Biden. It is, as the article stresses, the elephant in the room, and imo, a monstrous case of selective prosecution.
1 posted on 03/14/2024 11:47:19 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

any mention of WHEN she’ll rule?


2 posted on 03/14/2024 12:00:10 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

Fox News just reported that judge will probably NOT dismiss the case.


3 posted on 03/14/2024 12:22:08 PM PDT by BamaBelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise
I would think that the highly enterprising Hunter would find this type of documents a valuable commodity for his business.

An investigation might roll up the older Bidens. It's possible that the Biden's have been dealing in top secret information as a sideline to the political racketeering.

4 posted on 03/14/2024 12:27:09 PM PDT by oldbrowser ( democrats and Democracy are polar opposites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

All the vagaries are catching up to them.


6 posted on 03/14/2024 12:52:30 PM PDT by Lisbon1940 (I don’t see why they would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise
The timeline clearly establishes a malicious prosecution and misleading the court:

a) Smith charges Trump with unlawful possession of classified docs beginning the day he left office, January 20, 2021;

b) Months later, the DOE pulls Trump's 'Q' clearance but backdates the removal to January 20;

c) there is no clearly stated legal requirement for a President to have a clearance, nor the procedure for acquiring one. Such a requirement would mean the bureaucrats have a legal right to withhold information from the President, which is absurd.

d) there is no history of any President or Vice President being charged regarding handling classified docs, despite the fact that all past Presidents are known to have retained oodles of classified docs

This also shows how important it is that the case is being tried in Florida and not DC, as the DC circuit and court of appeals are clearly tools of the Democrats after Obama expanded the size of that circuit. Almost like they were planning to indict their political opponents.

7 posted on 03/14/2024 1:10:42 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson