Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

As I’ve noted before, Tulsi’s history may not be with us, but she sure as hell will DECAPITATE the Deep State (Neocons), should she get into power. She understands this bunch, and wants them GONE.


2 posted on 03/01/2024 6:44:32 PM PST by BobL (Trump gets my vote, even if I have to write him in; Millions of others will do the same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BobL

She talks a lot, but what conservative things has she done??

* She endorsed Joe Biden in 2020

* She tried to usher in Universal Basic Income

* She has called for banning AR-15s
* Favors Reparations
* No fossil fuels
* No nuclear energy
* Pro Medicare for all
* No electoral college
* Citizenship for “dreamers”
* pro abortion

* “I could not in good conscience vote against impeachment b/c I believe President Trump is guilty of wrongdoing” - Tulsi Gabbard

* This is who she truly is - a Democrat


10 posted on 03/01/2024 6:48:25 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BobL

I tend to agree. The other thing I think about a lot in Tulsi’s favor, is that Im not sure this presidency should really care whether it’s” Republican enough’ or “conservative enough” to build for the future. The fact is, “conservatism” seems to mean a whole lot of nothing these days. And as a “conservative” Id be content hanging out with an old school liberal and hashing out differences but agreeing we don’t want statists ruling us or the constitution being torn asunder. we don’t debate any of the core issues that the left and right used to argue, so me being a conservative or a liberal is secondary to the new duality: “Are we subjugates of the state? Or is the state a subjugate to its citizenry?” That’s a concern that members of the traditional outposts of “Left” and “Right” are currently bonding over (witness Russell Brand and Tucker Carlson for example.) and at the same time, it’s where “conservatives” are fracturing. I know I certainly have more in common with Tulsi Gabbard than Jay Nordlinger or that wanker Charles Cooke over at National Review.

So if I’m correct that this new bifurcation is the way we need to look at politics for the next 10-20 years, I see no reason why a Tulsi VP pick has a lot of potential.


53 posted on 03/01/2024 7:41:29 PM PST by Free Louie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BobL

gabbard is a HARD, HARD leftist ... PERIOD ...

JFKJ is a HARD, HARD leftist ... PERIOD ...


61 posted on 03/01/2024 8:22:56 PM PST by catnipman (A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BobL

I don’t believe that at all.


95 posted on 03/01/2024 11:27:39 PM PST by roving (Deplorable Listless Vessel Trumpist With Trumpitis and a Rainbow Bully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson