Thx. Let me know if it contains information that you find accurate and useful, or not.
Most certainly. This is one of the things I most appreciate about FR is the sharing of information. Granted, it is up to us to determine the veracity of any information shared, but at least we see it.
The traditional media simply tries to prevent you from seeing it. I would rather see it and figure out for myself, even if it is extra work, and even if I am sometimes wrong.
It reminded me of the media coverage of the corrupt and lying Fani Willis and Nathan Wade.
The headline at CNN might say “Nathan Wade’s longtime law partner could not recall any incriminating information about the alleged affair between Fani Willis and Nathan Wade...”
And if what CNN told you was all you knew, you might be convinced.
But if you watch the cross examination, every fiber of being in Wades longtime law partner Terrence Bradley screamed out lying and evasion.
And that was bad enough.
But when the actual texts of what he knew were revealed...he was flat out lying. He said he was merely conjecturing. But that isn’t what the texts said. They were very specific and locked into definitive time frames.
100% deception and outright lying.
And anyone who watched...they knew it. But in my example, CNN would give you none of that information. You would never know any better.
And you would be the worse for it.