Posted on 02/28/2024 1:04:01 AM PST by Enterprise
Terrence Bradley, Nathan Wade’s former law partner and divorce lawyer, allegedly told Trump co-defendant Michael Roman’s attorney outside of court that Fani Willis and Nathan Wade had sex at the law office she was renting before she was Fulton County District Attorney.
Bradley was back on the stand on Tuesday after previously refusing to answer questions and hiding behind attorney-client privilege. However, Judge Scott McAfee ruled he was not protected by attorney-client privilege and ordered him to testify Tuesday morning.
Attorney Ashleigh Merchant made this bombshell revelation during her examination of Bradley in the third hearing on a Motion to Disqualify Fani Willis from the RICO case against Trump and 18 co-defendants. Merchant asked Bradley if it’s true that Fani Willis had sex with Nathan Wade at her private law office before she was District Attorney and before Wade was hired to lead the prosecution.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
The dude was lying his butt off. He could not recall anything though he had previously sent texts and emails claiming things had happened.
He said he only had ONE conversation with his frat brother, long time friend and client about the booty calls with Fani. He couldn’t remember if that was before or after his firm entered into a big financial deal with Fani and the DA’s office.
It’s hard to believe anyone would hire a lawyer with such a poor memory of events. /s
I do think the judge saw right through the act. He already had the texts and emails, Whether he does anything about it is the question.
EC
Should have reminded him of the penalty for perjury.
Wade, I think...is finished with the Trump case. Whether the court will allow another lawyer to take over is the question.
WHY did Bradley tell Asleigh Merchant ALL this stuff about his friend WADE??
Three of the questioning lawyers did remind him of that. When the first one, Merchant, brought it up, his head bowed slightly, his shoulders slouched and he quietly acknowledged he knew he was under oath.
I suspect the best out for the judge is to disqualify the entire Fulton County DA Office from the case. Why this was allowed to proceed as a county case is beyond puzzling.
EC
“I do think the judge saw right through the act. He already had the texts and emails, Whether he does anything about it is the question.”
You mean... the same judge that used to work for Fani Willis and donated, as well as did his wife, to Fani Willis’s campaign? I think we already know how this case will be determined. As usual, I suspect the fix is in.
“Had Sex With Fani Willis at Her Law Office”
Probably happened many times. But wasn’t there testimony that they had sex in the Wade-Bradley office, too? Didn’t Bradley “catch” them inflagrante?
” the judge saw right through the act. He already had the texts and emails”
That’s what’s important. He’s seen all the docs, even if they all didn’t get exposed during testimony.
Is a judge required to make a decision based only the testimonies given in court, or can he consider everything he knows for sure even though it wasn’t discussed on the stand?
Sad, all the way round.
“The dude was lying his butt off. He could not recall anything though he had previously sent texts and emails claiming things had happened.”
For Republican attorneys that usually means disbarment and prison. For Democrat attorneys that usually means being place on Biden’s campaign staff. Just like it did for Obama’s Team.
BTTT
Problem solved (except that there are texts and emails. They are in evidence and the Judge has seen them).
i could not find confirmation of a garage at Willis’ rented Hapewood apartment.
what i did see is what appeared to be a remote controlled “boom gate” at the entrance to the common parking lot for the apartment complex.
the photos of the boom gate are freely available on the net. just reference the address, perform a web search, and look at the resulting images.
if there are detailed, date-stamped access records kept for the operation of the boom gate going back to 2021, things could get interesting.
The judge will consider his creditability, and based on the elements of creditability, he fails miserably. His testimony will be discarded, and the judge will consider the evidence, namely phone calls, prior statements in text messages, etc
Sounds like big Fani is just another government ho living off the taxpayers’ dime.
You forgot to add the words: stupid, angry, ugly, and commie
Still she seems to command the loyalty of the judge and the governor.
“It’s hard to believe anyone would hire a lawyer with such a poor memory of events.”
Wade and Willis had lots of cash to throw around and maybe all they did overnight together was drugs and alcohol. Not too likely, but not out of the question either. What lawyer would want to remember that?
Here’s the way I hope the judge looks at this. Regardless of the propriety of Willis hiring Wade as her personal sex toy, there is the issue of possible perjury committed by one or both of them. So, if the judge believes that perjury has been committed, and one or both are willing to lie in court, then it is possible that during the Trump trial, lies have already been introduced into the record. This would require not only a dismissal of both Willis and Wade from the case, it would require the judge to dismiss the case with prejudice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.