They could have been chatting over Bible verses. She is a fake-wannabe-minister on the side.
ajc.com
snip
“The records do not prove, in any way, the content of the communications between Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis; they do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade was ever at any particular location or address; they do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis were ever in the same place during any of the times listed [in the exhibit],” Willis’ motion said.
In fact, the motion said on multiple dates and times cited in the defense analysis, Willis was not at home. She provided copies of calendar entries to support that contention - including entries she said show she was at the office or at murder crime scenes.
Willis’ motion argued the defense exhibit should not be accepted as evidence because, among other things, the defendants violated the court’s rules on the disclosure of expert testimony. She argued the evidence is “clearly inadmissible and has little evidentiary value” and “is simply another attempt to garner media attention.”
It will now be up to Fulton Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee to decide whether to admit Mittelstadt’s affidavit and the phone records into evidence.