Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: alternatives?

Let us focus on why many of us—including me—warned that January 6 was a setup.

There was a long history of FBI counter-intelligence operations—COINTELPRO being the most well known.

COINTELPRO tactics were public information:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

Let us list some of them:

“Create a negative public image for target groups (for example through surveilling activists and then releasing negative personal information to the public)”

“Break down internal organization by creating conflicts (for example, by having agents exacerbate racial tensions, or send anonymous letters to try to create conflicts)”

“Create dissension between groups (for example, by spreading rumors that other groups were stealing money)”

“Restrict access to public resources (for example, by pressuring non-profit organizations to cut off funding or material support)”

“Restrict the ability to organize protest (for example, through agents promoting violence against police during planning and at protests)”

“Restrict the ability of individuals to participate in group activities (for example, by character assassinations, false arrests, surveillance)”

This should sound very familiar.

Let us take history and apply it in the current context.

The last time any party had a successful revolt against its own sitting president and forced him to withdraw was LBJ.

That was radically different than the current situation.

LBJ faced brutally bad poll numbers in upcoming Democratic primaries.

Biden does not face that.

There is zero historical precedent for what is proposed on this thread.

There is zero evidence as well—no secret memos, no secret meetings, nada, zero, zip.

C’mon man.

Show me the beef!


56 posted on 02/09/2024 9:21:45 AM PST by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg

Before 1900, the Federal government was not near as powerful as it is today. That makes recent elections more important to the government.

The Democrats certainly fixed the nomination for Hillary in 2016.

Each party has to have a plan in case their candidate dies or becomes incapacitated, or unelectable before the election.

While not president, remember the New Jersey senate where they replaced Torricelli right before the election.

There certainly wasn’t much MSM press about Michelle since 2016. Why the story appearing in late 2023 about her concern for the US?

I am sure there is plotting going on to replace Joe and that some groups are working to achieve some version of it while others are working to avoid replacing him. There is simply too much power concentrated in DC to believe otherwise.


89 posted on 02/09/2024 10:07:10 AM PST by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson