The 5th Circuit Court already applied a national injunction against the pistol brace rule in November. What does this decision do that the November one doesn’t?
https://www.ammoland.com/2023/11/federal-judge-stays-entire-atf-pistol-brace-rule/#axzz8R45SZfJD
This is a form of lawfare. The anti-gunners cause damage to gun owners in the form of threatened jail time and attorney expenses, even though they know the actions probably will not be upheld after the proceedings are begun or appealed. And if they can at the same time attack or weaken a gun-friendly red or red-leaning state and, by extension, its strong red governor, that’s just icing on the cake and really helps them fund-raise from their sycophant followers. They don’t miss an opportunity to demean Florida for those reasons. Or so it seems to me.
The judge talks about what is happening in other circuits, and considers it.
She can't control what happens in other circuits, and we cannot know what will happen in other cases.
So, she says all the plaintiffs in the Florida case are in Florida. The Supreme Court said to avoid national injunctions if possible; therefore, the injunction only applies to Florida. This case is independent of the Fifth Circuit cases.