I do agree that “Climate Change” is a fraud. But I think it’s a mistake to attack it on any sort of religious grounds.
/\
and you would be dead wrong,
leaning right between marx and mao.
its a cult with zero valid science behind it.
and our country and world is being made to bend our knees to it.
I will ignore your personal attack based on my FR name, and instead agree with you that “Climate Change” is a cult with no valid science behind it.
I’m a chemist by training, and as a scientist I am appalled by these Climate Change studies. For example, there is never any discussion of estimates of uncertainty. Without such discussions any scientific study is worthless.
But we will gain no traction with the general public if we attack Climate Change on religious grounds. On cult grounds, yes. On free speech grounds, yes. On scientific grounds, yes.
But not on religious grounds. It’s a bridge too far, and a distraction actually.
Not many are convinced of a real communism/climate/religion doctrine connection.
Not in the sense of it being claimed or defined as such by the adherents. Its impossible to apply the standard without people seeing that connection in a broader more clear way.
Much as its problematic, religion establishment clause is notreally well defined.