Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Roadrunner383; Liz; Red Badger; SunkenCiv; LS; Lazamataz; governsleastgovernsbest

Yes, sure. But. The recount only “rescammed (er, rescanned) the embedded optical image. There is absolutely no test EVER for the important questions:
1. Does QIR Code equal the printed words on the ballot?
2. Was each “piece of printed paper” actually handled and submitted by a single legally registered voter?

I can scan 500 sheets of a ream of pre-printed ballots. Ain’t no voter attached to any of those ballots.


11 posted on 01/20/2024 8:44:58 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A Cook PE

A more important question is, if it was “machines,” why then in AZ where we had PAPER BACKUP did the numbers match?

To achieve that someone would have had to be at EVERY SINGLE PRECINCT knowing the exact number of votes in that precinct and secretly feed in the EXACT same number of paper ballots. This of course, would have had to happen in deep red precincts as well as blue.

Didn’t happen. This was done the old fashioned way, with “Mules” bringing in the paper FIRST via early and absentee.


35 posted on 01/21/2024 6:29:38 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson