If this were that normal or typical we’d have been seeing it LONG before the vaxxes came along.
It’s the sudden spike that came after the vax mandates that tells us all we need to know.
That’s my point. We DID see it. Constantly.
But at such a low rate in the USA and UK that it didn’t register until COVID... Because we didn’t have other bird flu epidemics exponentially increasing the incidences.
Basically, the reaction to COVID deaths is a bit like people with a crippling fear of flying but jaywalk without thinking about it all the time, waking up one day to a major multi vehicle pile up on their doorstep involving pedestrians, and suddenly the realisation sets in that they always were far, far more likely to be killed crossing the street than by dying in a plane crash.
The last time we really saw a deadly pandemic in the UK was a century ago, with influenza. We rarely saw it at all during severely cold winters but they’re few and far between in the UK nowadays. So we’ve gotten complacent.
The plague we’re taught about at school in the UK had a double whammy - the first interaction was brought in by ship and needed close contact (bubonic plague) to spread from town to town, but then it went airborne causing pneumonic plague all over the country.
Japan, Korea and China have been observing the effects of bird flu on their doorsteps for far longer than us, and it’s why they locked down far faster and far harder than we did. Can’t blame COVID vaccines for that.
There’s a film made many years before COVID where the world was hit by a flu pandemic and masks/gloves/social distancing were all introduced to slow the spread. That wasn’t really a dystopian plot about gubmint control, it was based on scientific analysis of how best to combat a deadly pandemic involving airborne viruses... But it’s also based on historical fact. Those who avoided close contact with the infected escaped bubonic plague, and those who covered their faces were less likely to get pneumonic plague. Folks who survived the latter invariably had genetic or congenital factors working to their advantage, but we now know there were downsides to those factors.
I get your response to Malpeirce, but you mention these cases coming out. There are always bad things happening in aociety. Human trafficing is happening and getting worse all the time, but we don’t hear about it cause trends in news only last so long. So are more people dying cause of the jab or are there just more people posting and talking about it, especially in the circles we read. If we read liberal circles you would be hearing other “bad” things and think that is the biggest news of the day. Are there really more young athletes dying than before, or are there just more people likely to broadcast the events cause it may be something more than natural causes. I personally haven’t taken a side. Didn’t get the jab. Had a heart attack at 51 during Covid so got the full court press from the Cardiologist to get the jab. IDK, but if all these statistics are true, I would think it would be impossible to see a cardiologist these days. I got the best in town because I was pretty young, it should be impossible to see him these days, but its not. He also never brought it up again after a year. We need to consider both ways of looking at this.
Especially given the statistical relationship putting young men and teenage boys that have gotten a second dose of the vaccine at higher risk.
Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Robert Califf recently took to X to mourn the “catastrophic” decline in U.S. life expectancy.
But his post, which hit on smoking, diet, chronic illness and health care, ignored the obvious: People are dying in abnormally high numbers even now and long since COVID-19 waned. Yet public health agencies and medical societies are silent.
Plainly evident, quite simple, and clearly true. That’s why they need to employ so much propaganda and obfuscation.
Mom, who never listens to me and votes D, came this close twice and now has in-home care.