Skip to comments.
US Navy in a losing race to close China fleet gap
Asia Times ^
| JANUARY 15, 2024
| By GABRIEL HONRADA
Posted on 01/15/2024 5:44:12 PM PST by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: Reverend Wright
Since you are a boomer, you should know better.
41
posted on
01/15/2024 8:48:31 PM PST
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: ealgeone
We don’t need to.
Not even close.
42
posted on
01/15/2024 10:09:19 PM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: devere
You think so. On paper, maybe.
To: devere
Take a look at a map. China is surrounded by enemies.
If the Chinese send their navy out those countries will sink the Chinese ships using missiles from shore from all sides.
44
posted on
01/16/2024 12:44:16 PM PST
by
minnesota_bound
(Need more money to buy everything now)
To: Reverend Wright
To: Fai Mao
It isn’t so much technology as the facilities to make the guns that big. Forges could be built to do it but for only 36 cannon barrels, it would be cost-prohibitive.
A better (probably cheaper) solution is to figure out the issues on the Electromagnetic Railgun they were developing and to install more powerful lasers on ships.
Old US battleships had a range of about 30 miles at max. The German Paris gun was maybe 70-80 miles at best.
Basic AMRAAM missiles have a range of 25-30 miles, and are much more accurate. But for ship launched, the basic SM-2 has a range of ~100 miles. Tomahawks are around 1500 miles, but expensive. Harpoons, depending on variant, have a range of ~80 miles or 190 miles.
There's no point in any near-peer warfare using 'big' guns when missile range is 3-6 times further. Not to mention a carrier has a range of stupid far, and are all probably way faster and definitely have more endurance than a battleship could get up to/has without an entire turbines to reactor replacement. Also, who knows how good hull integrity is. Or wiring. Or how much of the electronics need to be completely replaced (all of it).
To: BobL
I think China builds something like 20 ships for every 1 ship we build. So thank you Labor Unions, you’ve pretty much ended the US as a superpower.
China produces tons of little ships with crappy materials. And it takes some time and effort to train enough people to man all those ships. Much less effectively man them. Not to mention combat activities and damage control.
But tonnage is what really matters, not so much the quantity. China has ~2.4MM tons of ships. These US has ~4.6MM, and that matters. Bigger ships can hold more, go further, and need less resupply, and are harder to kill.
To: Reverend Wright
and now we are in 2023, where it takes 3 years to build a single forging press for artillery ammunition. And only one small company in the whole country able to do it. That is sobering!
48
posted on
01/17/2024 7:44:11 PM PST
by
Colorado Doug
(Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson