It was less than a hundred readers out of millions of readers!
“It was less than a hundred readers out of millions of readers!”
Free Speech - if properly advocated and followed - would protect those hundred readers as long as their views were not causing or advocating direct harm to others.
That is important, and private platforms often forget the point. Substack, if it intends to be a platform that advocates free speech and expression is just another one.
If substack does not intend to be a free-speech platform, it doesn’t have to bother attempting to stuff the censorship genie back in the bottle - but I submit that is bad for their business in the long-term.