I did say that Hillary came into possession of hundreds of FBI files. I did say that Craig Livingstone was the person who acquired those files. We all know that for the longest time nobody admitted to hiring Livingstone.
It's possible that the FBI undertook this scheme on their own and the Clintons (or a Clinton insider) became aware of it and took advantage of it. You have to remember that in 1993 the White House Travel Office scandal began with the firing of long-time travel office personnel who were replaced with Clinton cronies. It's possible that the Clintons, new to DC and now under scrutiny for cronyism, decided to get some leverage of their own by getting a hold of classified FBI files on their potential enemies to send a message to people who might have been trying to mess with them.
It's possible that they found out more than they anticipated once they got a hold of those files. It's even possible that the parts of the FBI that managed the documents didn't understand the implications of giving those files to Craig Livingstone.
Anyway, this would all have been happening at the very earliest days of the Epstein sex trafficking ring. I doubt that Clinton was sampling the product at this time. He wouldn't need to, he was the President of the United States.
Now, fast-forward twenty years after Clinton is out of office...
One thing that bothers me is the report of a painting seen in Epstein's home in 2012 of Bill Clinton wearing Monica Lewinsky's blue dress and the artist who painted it. Forgetting about the reason why the artist painted, I'm surprised that the Clintons didn't demand that Epstein take it down, given that so many prominent people visited his home, Hillary was the Secretary of State, and was planning her own run for the presidency in 2016.
The artist says that she didn't intend for the painting to mock Clinton, but I think that Epstein certainly intended that impression by keeping it hung so centrally inside his home. The fact that the Clintons were apparently powerless to get Epstein to remove it suggests that the power in that circle tilted towards Epstein for some reason.
The notion that Barack Obama's Secretary of State and the heir-apparent to "Obama's third term" as President couldn't get Epstein to take down the painting mocking the Clintons in front of Epstein's powerful acquaintances (like Prince Andrew of England) says something -- I'm just not sure what -- but it can't be good for the Clintons.
-PJ
Interesting post. My thoughts:
1. The Clintons were comparatively very young when they came to power, compared to the existing political ruling class. Therefore, I think much of that FBI information was old, not hot off the press info from Epstein.
2. Occam’s Razor would indicate they just saw a file on one person, and asked to see more, rather than actively being involved in any way.
3. I would be careful trying to get inside the mind of any of these sociopaths, including those on the R side, and what they are thinking. It could very well be that Clinton might find that picture funny, or entertaining in some sick twisted way. Truly evil people enjoy lying, for example, in a way most God fearing people simply can’t comprehend. All we can know for sure is to stay away and keep them from impacting our lives.
Good post though. These certainly are interesting times, and a lot of the things they want us to believe about people and events simply aren’t true. It’s amazing how gullible some people are these days, when the access to information is greater than ever before. Question everything, I say. I grew up listening to Paul Harvey every day and “the rest of the story” because things are never quite what they seem.