Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not
The New American ^ | 12/07/23 | James Perloff

Posted on 12/07/2023 10:16:59 AM PST by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

1 posted on 12/07/2023 10:16:59 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Ping


2 posted on 12/07/2023 10:19:00 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (I didn't come here to guide lambs, but to awaken lions 🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Read a book a few years back outlining a lot of this info. Don’t recall the name of it.


3 posted on 12/07/2023 10:21:08 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

There is little doubt that FDR wanted to get us into WW2. He saw that as a necessity, and he was right.

But here’s the thing. FDR had a special fondness for the Navy. He had once been Assistant Secretary of the Navy. He carried out that job with vigor.

So I could see him maybe hanging the Philippines out as bait. But the fleet at Pearl Harbor? Nope, not buying it.


4 posted on 12/07/2023 10:24:18 AM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

In re: “While no one can excuse Japan’s belligerence in those days, it is also true that our government provoked that country in various ways — freezing her assets in America; closing the Panama Canal to her shipping; progressively halting vital exports to Japan until we finally joined Britain in an all-out embargo; sending a hostile note to the Japanese ambassador implying military threats if Tokyo did not alter its Pacific policies; and on November 26th — just 11 days before the Japanese attack — delivering an ultimatum that demanded, as prerequisites to resumed trade, that Japan withdraw all troops from China and Indochina, and in effect abrogate her Tripartite Treaty with Germany and Italy.”

It is interesting how the author describes the U.S. actions as actuions that “provoked” Japan, while ignoring the totally reasonable argument that Imperial Japan’s actions in Asia provoked the western nations retaliatory actions.


5 posted on 12/07/2023 10:25:03 AM PST by Wuli ( ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

My grandfather was a reporter in the whitehouse at the time. Said FDR, upon hearing the news, stood up and danced a jig (as best he could). He used a wheel chair but could get around without one when he had to. It was understood that the code had been broken and the Japanese diplomats were forced to wait until after the attack had taken place to ensure the outrage of the American public would be aroused after the ‘surprise’ attack took place.
To say something was to lose your liberty for decades.
If true, American lives were sacrificed to get FDR into the war he so desperately wanted to join.


6 posted on 12/07/2023 10:25:42 AM PST by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Three major conspiracy stories in three weeks, Lunar landing fake, JFK and now this old rehash.

I suspect our attention is being diverted intentionally , a whole new conspiracy theory.

7 posted on 12/07/2023 10:27:25 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Imagine that. A progressive Democrat POTUS had his own agenda, lied, obfuscated, dawdled and threw away thousands of American servicemen’s lives to suit his own ambitions.

Things are the same as it ever was, no?


8 posted on 12/07/2023 10:29:18 AM PST by SharpenedEdge (Stockpile. Prepare. Arm. Train. A Storm is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Perhaps it was Stinnett’s bestselling “Day of Deceit.”


9 posted on 12/07/2023 10:29:30 AM PST by Blurb2350 (posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
I quote my Grandfather: “Any thinking man knew that the Japanese were going to attack. The only question was the timing of the attack.”

He had a Sixth grade education - when that still meant something. My Mother showed me letters he wrote in 1940 stating these things. Alas, the letters have been lost to the moving process.

10 posted on 12/07/2023 10:31:08 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Japan began planning for its Pearl Harbor attack in January 1941.

FDR already knew what was ahead, if he needed America to be wounded in order to enter the war in the Pacific.


11 posted on 12/07/2023 10:32:43 AM PST by Wuli ( ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

You’re exactly right — FDR was keen to drag the US into the war, and he used a blockade of Japan to create the necessary provocation. I’ve read that FDR wasn’t at all surprised by Japan’s attack, but he was surprised that they attacked Pearl Harbor. Reportedly when aides rushed in to tell him about the attack, he replied “Pearl?! They attacked Pearl?!”


12 posted on 12/07/2023 10:33:22 AM PST by Blurb2350 (posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

> It is interesting how the author describes the U.S. actions as actions that “provoked” Japan, while ignoring the totally reasonable argument that Imperial Japan’s actions in Asia provoked the western nations retaliatory actions. <

Excellent point. The horrific Japanese “Rape of Nanking” occurred in 1937. The United States did not impose sanctions until 1941.

The Japanese started the ball rolling.


13 posted on 12/07/2023 10:33:26 AM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
The US government knowing in advance doesn't mean that the Japanese weren't nefarious for planning and executing the attack. All it means is that FDR and others who knew in advance were equally nefarious. But we already knew that.

It would have been better if we had submarines and aircraft carriers positioned to take out the Japanese fleet after they launched their aircraft.
14 posted on 12/07/2023 10:35:22 AM PST by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Neither do I.


15 posted on 12/07/2023 10:35:59 AM PST by quilterdebbie (We will endeavor to persevere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: quilterdebbie

do chess players give away their queen at the beginning of the game?

Giving up the fleet at Pearl would have been potential suicide had the Japanese headed northeast,


16 posted on 12/07/2023 10:41:25 AM PST by coalminersson (since )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Old news. The Dhimmicrats deny it categorically. But I believe it.
My father who fought the island hopping campaign across the pacific also believed it.


17 posted on 12/07/2023 10:43:28 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The reason the aircraft carriers were not at Pearl is because they were the most important component of 1940s modern warfare. They were made to leave just in time.


18 posted on 12/07/2023 10:46:15 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
My father worked as a civilian for the Navy Department in Washington D.C. before WWII. Later, he worked for the Corps of Engineers. Both he and my grandfather, who was extremely well-connected during the 30's and '40s, always told me that Roosevelt knew that Pearl Harbor was going to be attacked.

A few years before he died, my father told me the following story. Since he had extra tickets to a Redskins game to be played on December 7, the day before he offered them to a naval officer he worked with. His friend turned the offer down, telling my father that he was going to be busy with an attack on that day. My father shrugged it off, not knowing exactly what his friend meant. Later, while at the game, as the time the attack was happening in Hawaii, my father saw military personnel streaming down the aisles at the stadium to fetch away important people.

19 posted on 12/07/2023 10:47:29 AM PST by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

FDR was not so keen on getting into WW2 until the precious socialist utopia USSR was attacked, then he was all in. Same for the leftists in Britain. Germany and USSR had sighed a non-aggression pact. So the Brit leftists were not all that supportive until June 22, 1941, when Hitler violated the pact and the National Socialists invaded the Communist socialists. Then they were all united. “Papa Joe” Stalin was their favorite socialist, the great Soviet utopia had to be saved.

“The seduction of Marxism is especially acute among the western secular intellectuals. It’s lethal history largely ignored. Marxism is the opiate of the intellectual” - Stefan Molyneux


20 posted on 12/07/2023 10:53:05 AM PST by FiddlePig (The greatest threat to our sacred liberty is to not value it!””)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson