When the evidence does come in, they only see that evidence which supports their bias and ignore the rest.
And then there are those who create strawmen to defend their bias...like assuming these "others" are claimed to be interstellar (which of course is impossible, they say).
The general consensus has been since the 1970's that what we are dealing with is extra-dimensional. And lately people are noticing that, whatever these things are, they seem to be similar to what has historically been referred to as "spiritual" in nature.
I, for one, am just keeping an open mind. I think it's much too early to draw any conclusions.
I agree.I think its a little bit or a lot of everything. We definitely have images here as well as beings, IMHO. Crashes are just a fact of movement also IMHO.
Trying to understand beings that are 10-20,000 years ahead of us is sheer folley,we do what we can.
No telling how many crashes we have found or are hiding.
As for the rest i can’t summarize 30 or 35 years of study into a paragraph lots going on.